| jpsimon | 03-09-2006 02:11 PM |
been done in gt4
| Ferg | 03-10-2006 08:39 AM |
News roundy round.
[QUOTE]F1 teams sign new testing agreement
By Jonathan Noble Friday, March 10th 2006, 10:47 GMT
Formula One teams have now unanimously signed a new in-season testing agreement for the year ahead, autosport.com has learned.
Although the deal, which is based around the basic premise of a 36-day limit, was verbally agreed several weeks ago, it is understood that the final signature on the agreement was only put to paper last night.
All of F1's teams have confirmed to autosport.com that they have signed the document, meaning that there will not be a situation like last year where Ferrari operated to their own schedule because they did not agree with the 30-day limit agreed by their rivals.
The new agreement limits teams to a maximum of 36 days during the season, but they are able to nominate a circuit in their home country that has special dispensation.
A team will be able to test for a full day at their nominated track, but this will only count for half a day out of the allocation. This in theory means that Ferrari would be able to test for 72 days at Fiorano if they chose.
Although some team bosses have suggested that the 36-day limit does not go far enough in reducing testing, McLaren boss Ron Dennis said on Thursday that the deal was important in terms of bringing clarity.
"The testing agreement creates definition, but meaning what we have agreed to do and when, but as regards to the level of cost saving I would have liked to have seen, it has not really achieved that," Dennis said.
"But it is much better to have it that not have.
"It at least eliminates high cost testing, which was already creeping into the equation - i.e. intercontinental testing."
The testing deal also includes a summer testing ban and prevents teams from testing at Grand Prix venues before the races.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Toro Rosso undecided on engine future
By Jonathan Noble Friday, March 10th 2006, 11:34 GMT
Scuderia Toro Rosso have decided to wait on making a decision about whether they will continue with V10 engines in 2007.
The Red Bull Junior team held a meeting in the Sakhir paddock on Thursday to discuss their long-term plans but decided to wait until there is a clearer indication about the overall performance of their V10 power-unit before making a decision.
"We had a meeting here in Bahrain but nothing is decided," Toro Rosso team principal Franz Tost told autosport.com. "We have to see now how is the progress from our side and then we will have to see how everything is. It is too early to say and we will have to wait for now."
The team have a contract to run Cosworth V10 engines in 2007, as part of a two-year deal that they inherited from Minardi.
Tost suggested that if the team were to move forwards then they might need to switch to V8s, purely because the V10 would likely become less and less competitive. The team cannot begin contemplating the design of their 2007 car until they know the exact specification of their engine.
"The engine needs to be the first decision," added Tost. "We took over the Minardi contract because firstly Red Bull respects contracts and secondly because it was the quickest way and best way to build up the car and everything.
"Whether we continue with the Cosworth V10 we don't know, because after all these discussions we have to see where we are. If next year the V8s are not limited and we have the same V10 regulation (restriction) then we don't have a chance.
"From the middle of this season I expect the V8 engines to make a great jump forward. You will see."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Newey wants a long career at Red Bull
By Jonathan Noble Friday, March 10th 2006, 08:43 GMT
Adrian Newey expects to stay at Red Bull Racing for the long-term, beyond the three-year term of his current contract with the team.
The highly rated designer joined the Milton Keynes-based outfit in January, after almost 10 years at McLaren, having decided that he needed a fresh challenge in the sport.
Speaking about his future plans ahead of the first race of the season, Newey said he expected to have a lengthy stay at Red Bull Racing and that he had no intention of switching teams when his current contract ended.
"This is a three-year deal, but the goal is longer term than that," he said. "It is a three-year commitment but I am anticipating being here for more than three years.
"There is no point going beyond a three-year contract in F1, but the intention is more long term."
Newey said part of the attraction for his switch to Red Bull Racing was that he wanted to work with a younger team and help move them up the field.
"I wanted, after working for two well-established teams - Williams and McLaren - I really wanted to get involved in a younger team where we could build it up into a force in the future. That more than anything attracted me."
Newey is planning to attend half a dozen races this year to understand the team better, although his main attention is on next year's RB3.
"My immediate focus has been on longer-term projects. Having said that, anything that spins out of it can be applied to what we're doing this year."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Briatore says new F1 deal is close
By Michele Lostia Friday, March 10th 2006, 10:34 GMT
Renault team chief Flavio Briatore says Formula One's manufacturer-backed teams are close to an agreement with Bernie Ecclestone to commit to the sport beyond 2008.
Briatore's comments follow positive signs from both Ecclestone and the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association which suggest a deal is not far away.
The GPMA want a bigger share of the sport's revenues and they have threatened to launch their own championship from 2008, if their demands are not satisfied.
But Briatore has joined Ecclestone in saying the threat is close to going away.
"On a commercial level, we're close to an agreement with Ecclestone," Briatore told Gazzetta dello Sport. "The important thing is for F1 to generate profits, not costs. Our position is close to Ferrari's. The share to distribute to the teams should go from about 27% to 50-55%.
"Obviously we must not collect more money in order to just spend more. In 1995 we won the championship with 100 million dollars. Now we spend six times as much and the personnel has tripled, but we're not offering a spectacle up to the costs." [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]F1 teams sign new testing agreement
By Jonathan Noble Friday, March 10th 2006, 10:47 GMT
Formula One teams have now unanimously signed a new in-season testing agreement for the year ahead, autosport.com has learned.
Although the deal, which is based around the basic premise of a 36-day limit, was verbally agreed several weeks ago, it is understood that the final signature on the agreement was only put to paper last night.
All of F1's teams have confirmed to autosport.com that they have signed the document, meaning that there will not be a situation like last year where Ferrari operated to their own schedule because they did not agree with the 30-day limit agreed by their rivals.
The new agreement limits teams to a maximum of 36 days during the season, but they are able to nominate a circuit in their home country that has special dispensation.
A team will be able to test for a full day at their nominated track, but this will only count for half a day out of the allocation. This in theory means that Ferrari would be able to test for 72 days at Fiorano if they chose.
Although some team bosses have suggested that the 36-day limit does not go far enough in reducing testing, McLaren boss Ron Dennis said on Thursday that the deal was important in terms of bringing clarity.
"The testing agreement creates definition, but meaning what we have agreed to do and when, but as regards to the level of cost saving I would have liked to have seen, it has not really achieved that," Dennis said.
"But it is much better to have it that not have.
"It at least eliminates high cost testing, which was already creeping into the equation - i.e. intercontinental testing."
The testing deal also includes a summer testing ban and prevents teams from testing at Grand Prix venues before the races.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Toro Rosso undecided on engine future
By Jonathan Noble Friday, March 10th 2006, 11:34 GMT
Scuderia Toro Rosso have decided to wait on making a decision about whether they will continue with V10 engines in 2007.
The Red Bull Junior team held a meeting in the Sakhir paddock on Thursday to discuss their long-term plans but decided to wait until there is a clearer indication about the overall performance of their V10 power-unit before making a decision.
"We had a meeting here in Bahrain but nothing is decided," Toro Rosso team principal Franz Tost told autosport.com. "We have to see now how is the progress from our side and then we will have to see how everything is. It is too early to say and we will have to wait for now."
The team have a contract to run Cosworth V10 engines in 2007, as part of a two-year deal that they inherited from Minardi.
Tost suggested that if the team were to move forwards then they might need to switch to V8s, purely because the V10 would likely become less and less competitive. The team cannot begin contemplating the design of their 2007 car until they know the exact specification of their engine.
"The engine needs to be the first decision," added Tost. "We took over the Minardi contract because firstly Red Bull respects contracts and secondly because it was the quickest way and best way to build up the car and everything.
"Whether we continue with the Cosworth V10 we don't know, because after all these discussions we have to see where we are. If next year the V8s are not limited and we have the same V10 regulation (restriction) then we don't have a chance.
"From the middle of this season I expect the V8 engines to make a great jump forward. You will see."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Newey wants a long career at Red Bull
By Jonathan Noble Friday, March 10th 2006, 08:43 GMT
Adrian Newey expects to stay at Red Bull Racing for the long-term, beyond the three-year term of his current contract with the team.
The highly rated designer joined the Milton Keynes-based outfit in January, after almost 10 years at McLaren, having decided that he needed a fresh challenge in the sport.
Speaking about his future plans ahead of the first race of the season, Newey said he expected to have a lengthy stay at Red Bull Racing and that he had no intention of switching teams when his current contract ended.
"This is a three-year deal, but the goal is longer term than that," he said. "It is a three-year commitment but I am anticipating being here for more than three years.
"There is no point going beyond a three-year contract in F1, but the intention is more long term."
Newey said part of the attraction for his switch to Red Bull Racing was that he wanted to work with a younger team and help move them up the field.
"I wanted, after working for two well-established teams - Williams and McLaren - I really wanted to get involved in a younger team where we could build it up into a force in the future. That more than anything attracted me."
Newey is planning to attend half a dozen races this year to understand the team better, although his main attention is on next year's RB3.
"My immediate focus has been on longer-term projects. Having said that, anything that spins out of it can be applied to what we're doing this year."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Briatore says new F1 deal is close
By Michele Lostia Friday, March 10th 2006, 10:34 GMT
Renault team chief Flavio Briatore says Formula One's manufacturer-backed teams are close to an agreement with Bernie Ecclestone to commit to the sport beyond 2008.
Briatore's comments follow positive signs from both Ecclestone and the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association which suggest a deal is not far away.
The GPMA want a bigger share of the sport's revenues and they have threatened to launch their own championship from 2008, if their demands are not satisfied.
But Briatore has joined Ecclestone in saying the threat is close to going away.
"On a commercial level, we're close to an agreement with Ecclestone," Briatore told Gazzetta dello Sport. "The important thing is for F1 to generate profits, not costs. Our position is close to Ferrari's. The share to distribute to the teams should go from about 27% to 50-55%.
"Obviously we must not collect more money in order to just spend more. In 1995 we won the championship with 100 million dollars. Now we spend six times as much and the personnel has tripled, but we're not offering a spectacle up to the costs." [/QUOTE]
| Ferg | 03-13-2006 10:20 AM |
News round up.
[QUOTE]McLaren to investigate Montoya's problems
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 15:01 GMT
McLaren will begin investigations this week in a bid to get on top of the minor engine problems that marred Juan Pablo Montoya's Bahrain Grand Prix weekend.
The Colombian suffered from engine mapping issues that left him down on power compared to teammate Kimi Raikkonen when the engine was in certain modes - and that played a part in his disappointing start to the campaign.
McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh has said the team are hoping that they get time this week to track down the problem and resolve it before the action gets underway in Malaysia on Friday.
"I think we had some issues over the weekend with Montoya's engine," explained Whitmarsh.
"We have a number of different modes of operation with the engine. We have economy, super economy and full mode and certainly in the lesser modes of control there was something in the engine that we were trying to track down all weekend that gave him a slight element of disadvantage.
"It's the same engine this weekend but we have got a bit more time to study it now. We cannot change the mechanics of the engine but we are allowed to change the software and the mapping.
"With a bit of detailed analysis maybe we can find something there to give him more confidence in the operating regimes of the engine."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Coulthard calls for engine rule re-think
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 12:35 GMT
David Coulthard has called on the FIA to re-examine the penalties for changing an engine after the heartbreak of his power-unit failing after the chequered flag in Bahrain.
The Red Bull Racing driver had endured a frustrating afternoon at Sakhir, mostly affected by a major flat-spot on his right front tyre that dropped him to 10th overall, but it got worse after the chequered after he suffered an engine problem.
With a new power-unit needed for this weekend's Malaysian Grand Prix, Coulthard is facing the prospect of starting from the back of the grid before the action has even begun.
Coulthard bumped into FIA president Max Mosley immediately after the race in Bahrain to express his disappointment about the situation, and later called on the sport's governing body to consider a change to the 10-place grid penalty system.
"I saw Max and jokingly said you need to sort this out," explained Coulthard. "For me I was 14th on the grid and, if you give me 10 places, then I am at the back. I am not driving a McLaren and I cannot go from there to third place.
"I understand the regulations to try and make people use less engines, but I think there should be a handicap penalty based on a performance at a GP. Maybe it could be percentage to the fastest time, but just 10 places is wrong. The guys at the front only ever get to just outside the top 10 whereas we always have to go to the back."
Looking back at the race, Coulthard admitted there was some encouragement in seeing teammate Christian Klien get to the chequered flag - even though his own race was a disappointment.
Klien's performance was the first time the RB2 had completed a full race distance following the troubled pre-season testing build-up.
"I think it is important after all the difficulties that we had to get one point," added Coulthard. "It is kind of like we have got the first part of the job done.
"For me, my race was not very enjoyable. I really felt like I was learning about the car because it is the longest runs I have done with it, so I had a bit of a journey into the unknown.
"I never really felt comfortable all weekend and, to add insult to the rest of it, I flat-spotted my front when I was battling with Nick Heidfeld right down to the metal in the wheel.
"My visibility was zero and I had the conversation with the team, was I better pitting and getting a new set of tyres versus staying on track? With hindsight being a wonderful thing maybe I should have pitted and put new tyres on."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Ecclestone interested in Ferrari stake
By Jonathan Noble Saturday, March 11th 2006, 10:38 GMT
Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone has said he would be interested in becoming a shareholder in Ferrari, after Mediobanca said this week that it planned to sell its stake in the team.
The Italian bank has confirmed that it is looking to sell their 15 percent stake in Ferrari this season, to free up capital for the company.
The bank is in talks with Ferrari's parent company Fiat about a deal, although Mediobanca has admitted that private investors were also being considered.
One Mediobanca official was quoted as saying this week: "We are talking to Fiat about a progressive divestment of our stake. We are confident of having a solution in the next month, or month and a half."
The talk of a sale has prompted renewed speculation that Ecclestone may get involved, with the sport's commercial boss linked with a possible buy-in last year.
Ecclestone told Gazzetta dello Sport today that he would definitely consider buying into Ferrari - but made it clear that the price had to be right.
"Yes, the thing interests me," he said. "I have always loved Ferrari, its history and Enzo Ferrari.
"Today it is a great industry and it would appeal to me to own a piece of it. So I am interested but it depends, as always, on how much they want."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Todt plays down rear wing controversy
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 10:46 GMT
Ferrari team chief Jean Todt has played down the controversy surrounding the rear wing of their 248 F1 car at the Bahrain Grand Prix.
As revealed by autosport.com, some of Ferrari's rivals are unhappy about the rear wing, even though it was declared legal by the sport's governing body.
"I am not at all happy about it," said Renault's director of engineering Pat Symonds. "It is very clear what you can or cannot do. There might be specific rules about specific parts, but there are also general rules and I know exactly what that wing does. And that is not what I would expect."
Ferrari's rivals are unhappy because they believe the rear wing, while complying with the letter of the rules, does not comply their intention.
The element was further checked by FIA delegates during the Bahrain Grand Prix weekend and it was given the thumbs-up.
Todt laughed off the controversy and said he was not aware of any problems.
"It demonstrates that we are back at the top again," said Todt. "It is good news when people start to be interested in Ferrari again.
"I am not aware of a problem. If the FIA comes to us and says there is a problem then our technical director Ross Brawn will come to me but the FIA has no problem.
"I am mature in this business. I do care about facts but not about speculation and all of that. I am too old to lose time on that."
Ferrari were back in contention in Bahrain after a dismal 2005 season, with Michael Schumacher scoring pole position and finishing in second place behind world champion Fernando Alonso. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Button upbeat despite clutch problems
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 14:52 GMT
Jenson Button thinks that if Honda Racing can get on top of the clutch issue that wrecked his Bahrain Grand Prix then they will definitely be fighting with Renault and Ferrari for victory this season.
The Honda Racing driver had qualified third for the season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix but it all went wrong at the start when a clutch issue led to him getting away slowly and dropping well down the order.
Despite a strong comeback drive to fourh place, Button was unable to make an impact on the fight at the front between Fernando Alonso and Michael Schumacher, but he is confident that his car is strong enough to be up there.
"The clutch thing is very disappointing, but the main thing is that we know our pace is there and the great thing is that we haven't got to wait for two weeks to show that," he said.
"Next weekend we will be racing and we can show the car's pace in hot conditions. We just have to sort the starts out and if we do that then we can be challenging the top two teams.
"I think it is going to be a good battle this year, with really competitive cars out there - and Williams looked competitive as well."
Button believes that the fact the minor clutch issue wrecked their hopes of victory should act as a wake-up call to the team to know that they cannot afford to make any mistakes if they are going to fight for wins.
"If there is any issue like that it costs you massively. We are not going to take it lightly, and we are going to look at everything and working out the reasons why.
"I am happy with the car but I am unhappy we had an issue. At least we are not coming away from here with an issue and we were not quick. Compared to the top cars, this is the quickest we have ever been."
Button says he also has no issue with teammate Rubens Barrichello, despite the fact he lost valuable time early in the race fighting for position with the Brazilian.
"We are here to race and it was great," he added. "We spoke about things after the race and that is the way it should be."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]McLaren to investigate Montoya's problems
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 15:01 GMT
McLaren will begin investigations this week in a bid to get on top of the minor engine problems that marred Juan Pablo Montoya's Bahrain Grand Prix weekend.
The Colombian suffered from engine mapping issues that left him down on power compared to teammate Kimi Raikkonen when the engine was in certain modes - and that played a part in his disappointing start to the campaign.
McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh has said the team are hoping that they get time this week to track down the problem and resolve it before the action gets underway in Malaysia on Friday.
"I think we had some issues over the weekend with Montoya's engine," explained Whitmarsh.
"We have a number of different modes of operation with the engine. We have economy, super economy and full mode and certainly in the lesser modes of control there was something in the engine that we were trying to track down all weekend that gave him a slight element of disadvantage.
"It's the same engine this weekend but we have got a bit more time to study it now. We cannot change the mechanics of the engine but we are allowed to change the software and the mapping.
"With a bit of detailed analysis maybe we can find something there to give him more confidence in the operating regimes of the engine."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Coulthard calls for engine rule re-think
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 12:35 GMT
David Coulthard has called on the FIA to re-examine the penalties for changing an engine after the heartbreak of his power-unit failing after the chequered flag in Bahrain.
The Red Bull Racing driver had endured a frustrating afternoon at Sakhir, mostly affected by a major flat-spot on his right front tyre that dropped him to 10th overall, but it got worse after the chequered after he suffered an engine problem.
With a new power-unit needed for this weekend's Malaysian Grand Prix, Coulthard is facing the prospect of starting from the back of the grid before the action has even begun.
Coulthard bumped into FIA president Max Mosley immediately after the race in Bahrain to express his disappointment about the situation, and later called on the sport's governing body to consider a change to the 10-place grid penalty system.
"I saw Max and jokingly said you need to sort this out," explained Coulthard. "For me I was 14th on the grid and, if you give me 10 places, then I am at the back. I am not driving a McLaren and I cannot go from there to third place.
"I understand the regulations to try and make people use less engines, but I think there should be a handicap penalty based on a performance at a GP. Maybe it could be percentage to the fastest time, but just 10 places is wrong. The guys at the front only ever get to just outside the top 10 whereas we always have to go to the back."
Looking back at the race, Coulthard admitted there was some encouragement in seeing teammate Christian Klien get to the chequered flag - even though his own race was a disappointment.
Klien's performance was the first time the RB2 had completed a full race distance following the troubled pre-season testing build-up.
"I think it is important after all the difficulties that we had to get one point," added Coulthard. "It is kind of like we have got the first part of the job done.
"For me, my race was not very enjoyable. I really felt like I was learning about the car because it is the longest runs I have done with it, so I had a bit of a journey into the unknown.
"I never really felt comfortable all weekend and, to add insult to the rest of it, I flat-spotted my front when I was battling with Nick Heidfeld right down to the metal in the wheel.
"My visibility was zero and I had the conversation with the team, was I better pitting and getting a new set of tyres versus staying on track? With hindsight being a wonderful thing maybe I should have pitted and put new tyres on."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Ecclestone interested in Ferrari stake
By Jonathan Noble Saturday, March 11th 2006, 10:38 GMT
Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone has said he would be interested in becoming a shareholder in Ferrari, after Mediobanca said this week that it planned to sell its stake in the team.
The Italian bank has confirmed that it is looking to sell their 15 percent stake in Ferrari this season, to free up capital for the company.
The bank is in talks with Ferrari's parent company Fiat about a deal, although Mediobanca has admitted that private investors were also being considered.
One Mediobanca official was quoted as saying this week: "We are talking to Fiat about a progressive divestment of our stake. We are confident of having a solution in the next month, or month and a half."
The talk of a sale has prompted renewed speculation that Ecclestone may get involved, with the sport's commercial boss linked with a possible buy-in last year.
Ecclestone told Gazzetta dello Sport today that he would definitely consider buying into Ferrari - but made it clear that the price had to be right.
"Yes, the thing interests me," he said. "I have always loved Ferrari, its history and Enzo Ferrari.
"Today it is a great industry and it would appeal to me to own a piece of it. So I am interested but it depends, as always, on how much they want."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Todt plays down rear wing controversy
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 10:46 GMT
Ferrari team chief Jean Todt has played down the controversy surrounding the rear wing of their 248 F1 car at the Bahrain Grand Prix.
As revealed by autosport.com, some of Ferrari's rivals are unhappy about the rear wing, even though it was declared legal by the sport's governing body.
"I am not at all happy about it," said Renault's director of engineering Pat Symonds. "It is very clear what you can or cannot do. There might be specific rules about specific parts, but there are also general rules and I know exactly what that wing does. And that is not what I would expect."
Ferrari's rivals are unhappy because they believe the rear wing, while complying with the letter of the rules, does not comply their intention.
The element was further checked by FIA delegates during the Bahrain Grand Prix weekend and it was given the thumbs-up.
Todt laughed off the controversy and said he was not aware of any problems.
"It demonstrates that we are back at the top again," said Todt. "It is good news when people start to be interested in Ferrari again.
"I am not aware of a problem. If the FIA comes to us and says there is a problem then our technical director Ross Brawn will come to me but the FIA has no problem.
"I am mature in this business. I do care about facts but not about speculation and all of that. I am too old to lose time on that."
Ferrari were back in contention in Bahrain after a dismal 2005 season, with Michael Schumacher scoring pole position and finishing in second place behind world champion Fernando Alonso. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Button upbeat despite clutch problems
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 14:52 GMT
Jenson Button thinks that if Honda Racing can get on top of the clutch issue that wrecked his Bahrain Grand Prix then they will definitely be fighting with Renault and Ferrari for victory this season.
The Honda Racing driver had qualified third for the season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix but it all went wrong at the start when a clutch issue led to him getting away slowly and dropping well down the order.
Despite a strong comeback drive to fourh place, Button was unable to make an impact on the fight at the front between Fernando Alonso and Michael Schumacher, but he is confident that his car is strong enough to be up there.
"The clutch thing is very disappointing, but the main thing is that we know our pace is there and the great thing is that we haven't got to wait for two weeks to show that," he said.
"Next weekend we will be racing and we can show the car's pace in hot conditions. We just have to sort the starts out and if we do that then we can be challenging the top two teams.
"I think it is going to be a good battle this year, with really competitive cars out there - and Williams looked competitive as well."
Button believes that the fact the minor clutch issue wrecked their hopes of victory should act as a wake-up call to the team to know that they cannot afford to make any mistakes if they are going to fight for wins.
"If there is any issue like that it costs you massively. We are not going to take it lightly, and we are going to look at everything and working out the reasons why.
"I am happy with the car but I am unhappy we had an issue. At least we are not coming away from here with an issue and we were not quick. Compared to the top cars, this is the quickest we have ever been."
Button says he also has no issue with teammate Rubens Barrichello, despite the fact he lost valuable time early in the race fighting for position with the Brazilian.
"We are here to race and it was great," he added. "We spoke about things after the race and that is the way it should be."[/QUOTE]
| Bonzo | 03-13-2006 11:08 AM |
Am I out to lunch in thinking Bernie owning part of Ferrari is just getting a bit too personal considering his position in F1?
Talk about opening up a can-O-worms.
Talk about opening up a can-O-worms.
| NYEJ25 | 03-13-2006 11:20 AM |
[QUOTE=Bonzo]Am I out to lunch in thinking Bernie owning part of Ferrari is just getting a bit too personal considering his position in F1?
Talk about opening up a can-O-worms.[/QUOTE]
I agree, Kind of seems like a conflict of interests to me.
Talk about opening up a can-O-worms.[/QUOTE]
I agree, Kind of seems like a conflict of interests to me.
| Ferg | 03-13-2006 12:34 PM |
Bernie with a conflict of interest...perish the thought!
Bernie is my hero.
Can anyone think of another businessman who has managed to sell the same product four seperate times, each time pocketing a huge amount of cash (they call 1,000,000 pounds in the UK a 'Bernie" for good reason) while remaining in complete control.
It's even funnier when you consider, that in the words of Ken Tyrell, "Bernie never owned it in the first place...." :huh: :lol:
[URL=http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=960205]->GP of Malaysia Thread!!<-[/URL]
[QUOTE]McLaren aim to convince Raikkonen to stay
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 17:28 GMT
McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh believes that his team's chances of convincing Kimi Raikkonen to stay next year have not been dented by the reliability problems they suffered in Bahrain.
Raikkonen had gone into the year hoping that McLaren had got over the reliability issues that wrecked his 2005 title charge, but history appeared to repeat itself when he suffered an electrical problem on Friday and then a spectacular suspension failure in qualifying.
Despite those issues, however, Whitmarsh believes that Raikkonen has already seen the potential on offer from the MP4-21 - especially with his charge to third place in the race.
Whitmarsh has made no secret of the fact that McLaren want to convince Raikkonen to stay on board as Fernando Alonso's future teammate � and producing a winning-car will be crucial in their hopes of doing that.
"Regardless of Kimi, our primary motivation is to win a world championship," he added. "That is what we're here to do, and you need a reliable car and a quick car to do that.
"Kimi and his management will do what they feel is right for them. I think we have made no particular secret of the fact that we want Kimi to stay with us. We have got one world champion in the car next year and it would be nice to have a second one with Kimi taking the title and being in the car alongside Fernando.
"We would be very happy with that, but at the same time you cannot do anything about that. You can only go out and win races. It doesn't add any extra pressure or impetus to the programme. The reality is that we have got a strong technical organisation.
"The whole team are working hard and for our own egos and motivation we are bitterly disappointed when we let ourselves down like with what happened in qualifying here."[/QUOTE]
Bernie is my hero.
Can anyone think of another businessman who has managed to sell the same product four seperate times, each time pocketing a huge amount of cash (they call 1,000,000 pounds in the UK a 'Bernie" for good reason) while remaining in complete control.
It's even funnier when you consider, that in the words of Ken Tyrell, "Bernie never owned it in the first place...." :huh: :lol:
[URL=http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=960205]->GP of Malaysia Thread!!<-[/URL]
[QUOTE]McLaren aim to convince Raikkonen to stay
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 13th 2006, 17:28 GMT
McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh believes that his team's chances of convincing Kimi Raikkonen to stay next year have not been dented by the reliability problems they suffered in Bahrain.
Raikkonen had gone into the year hoping that McLaren had got over the reliability issues that wrecked his 2005 title charge, but history appeared to repeat itself when he suffered an electrical problem on Friday and then a spectacular suspension failure in qualifying.
Despite those issues, however, Whitmarsh believes that Raikkonen has already seen the potential on offer from the MP4-21 - especially with his charge to third place in the race.
Whitmarsh has made no secret of the fact that McLaren want to convince Raikkonen to stay on board as Fernando Alonso's future teammate � and producing a winning-car will be crucial in their hopes of doing that.
"Regardless of Kimi, our primary motivation is to win a world championship," he added. "That is what we're here to do, and you need a reliable car and a quick car to do that.
"Kimi and his management will do what they feel is right for them. I think we have made no particular secret of the fact that we want Kimi to stay with us. We have got one world champion in the car next year and it would be nice to have a second one with Kimi taking the title and being in the car alongside Fernando.
"We would be very happy with that, but at the same time you cannot do anything about that. You can only go out and win races. It doesn't add any extra pressure or impetus to the programme. The reality is that we have got a strong technical organisation.
"The whole team are working hard and for our own egos and motivation we are bitterly disappointed when we let ourselves down like with what happened in qualifying here."[/QUOTE]
| Ferg | 03-14-2006 08:31 AM |
news or whatever..
[QUOTE]Raikkonen keeps his options open
By Jonathan Noble Tuesday, March 14th 2006, 12:59 GMT
A recent visit to Toyota's factory by Kimi Raikkonen's management team indicates that the Finn is keeping his options wide open for next year.
Although Raikkonen has been strongly linked with a move from McLaren to Ferrari next season, sources have revealed that his management team are considering all their possibilities and have certainly not yet discounted other teams from the equation.
Sources have revealed to autosport.com that Raikkonen's managers Steve and David Robertson recently visited Toyota's Cologne factory to look at the facilities and hold talks with the team about a deal for next year.
And although Toyota's poor start to the season will have done little to entice Raikkonen to take a gamble on them, the fact that the Finn is not going to rush into a decision means that the Japanese manufacturer still remain a possibility if they can turn their season around.
Sources claim that Raikkonen is likely to finalise his plans around May, when Ferrari are expected to be informed at the latest by Michael Schumacher about whether he intends to remain with them.
Even though Raikkonen has made it clear that he would happily race as Schumacher's teammate, the seven-time world champion may be reluctant for the team to take on board a driver of Raikkonen's stature.
It is widely believed that Schumacher's contracts with Ferrari guarantee him the number one status at the team, and there would be little reason for him to concede on that point with any new deal.
Reports in the German press today are claiming that Schumacher has already indicated that he wants to remain at Ferrari next year following the successful start to their season.
Should Schumacher commit to Ferrari with no change to his number one status, then that would force Raikkonen to either accept continuing with McLaren or decide to take a gamble on Toyota - which would likely offer him the most money. An outside possibility, however, is a switch to Renault.
McLaren boss Ron Dennis made it clear at the weekend that he would respect Raikkonen's decision if the Finn, or teammate Juan Pablo Montoya, decided to leave his team at the end of the year
"I believe in freedom of choice, but it's a two way street," said Dennis. "The driver is an important part of the team but, at the end of the day, if we chose we could contract a second driver for 2007 tomorrow, just as Kimi or Juan could sign for another team tomorrow.
"If Kimi or Juan thinks their future is best served by driving for another team that's what they should do. If we think our future is best served by contracting another driver for next year - that's what we'll do."
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]FIA, GPMA divided on standard ECU
By Jonathan Noble Tuesday, March 14th 2006, 11:09 GMT
The chances of a final agreement being reached between the manufacturers and the FIA to head off the threat of a breakaway now depend on a deal over standard ECUs in Formula One, autosport.com has learned.
Although a meeting between FIA president Max Mosley, F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone and representatives of the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association in Bahrain failed to deliver a final deal to secure F1's future, the situation appears to be edging towards a solution.
An optimistic FIA president Max Mosley said after the meeting: "I would be disappointed if we didn't get the manufacturers sorted in the next few weeks, or even by the end of the month."
There appears to be general agreement about the commercial terms on offer to the teams and there is growing unity over the need to cut costs with future F1 technical regulations.
The manufacturers are even believed to support Mosley's plans to open up a short window of opportunity for entries to the 2008 championship to allow talks to begin about framing the future those regulations.
Mosley said about the entry window: "The world council have got to agree but assuming they do we will start on March 24 and finish on March 31.
"They all understand why now. If we are going to make any adjustments to the regulations we need the three months to do it and we can only do it with people who are in the championship.
"If people in the championship want to discuss them we can do that once they've entered. Or they can not enter, wait and see what the regulations are, and then decide."
However, high level sources close to the negotiations have revealed that there remain major differences of opinion between the manufacturers and the FIA over plans for a standard ECU.
It is understood that Mosley held talks with individual manufacturer representatives over the course of the Bahrain Grand Prix weekend and the one consistent area of concern for each of the carmakers was the standard ECU.
The carmakers are believed to be adamant that they do not want standard ECUs in F1, because they believe it will detract from the technological challenge of the sport, while Mosley believes that standard ECUs are best for F1.
It is understood that Mosley has indicated to the manufacturers that he will not compromise on this issue, however, which looks set to cause some fraught talks in hammering out a deal in the next few weeks.
BMW motorsport director Mario Theissen told autosport.com that he hoped discussions over the technical regulations would be conducted in a sensible manner.
"I don't really see a point in a tough fight," he said. "I think one should sit down and think about what is reasonable, what are the interests of the teams, the spectators and certainly the commercial rights holders, and then go for it.
"In my view, let me first say we support cost cutting but we have to look for a balance. For F1 the balance is that it is the pinnacle of motorsport, and it was the FIA who released last year than the fans wants to see technology, but on the other hand we have to get costs under control."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Raikkonen keeps his options open
By Jonathan Noble Tuesday, March 14th 2006, 12:59 GMT
A recent visit to Toyota's factory by Kimi Raikkonen's management team indicates that the Finn is keeping his options wide open for next year.
Although Raikkonen has been strongly linked with a move from McLaren to Ferrari next season, sources have revealed that his management team are considering all their possibilities and have certainly not yet discounted other teams from the equation.
Sources have revealed to autosport.com that Raikkonen's managers Steve and David Robertson recently visited Toyota's Cologne factory to look at the facilities and hold talks with the team about a deal for next year.
And although Toyota's poor start to the season will have done little to entice Raikkonen to take a gamble on them, the fact that the Finn is not going to rush into a decision means that the Japanese manufacturer still remain a possibility if they can turn their season around.
Sources claim that Raikkonen is likely to finalise his plans around May, when Ferrari are expected to be informed at the latest by Michael Schumacher about whether he intends to remain with them.
Even though Raikkonen has made it clear that he would happily race as Schumacher's teammate, the seven-time world champion may be reluctant for the team to take on board a driver of Raikkonen's stature.
It is widely believed that Schumacher's contracts with Ferrari guarantee him the number one status at the team, and there would be little reason for him to concede on that point with any new deal.
Reports in the German press today are claiming that Schumacher has already indicated that he wants to remain at Ferrari next year following the successful start to their season.
Should Schumacher commit to Ferrari with no change to his number one status, then that would force Raikkonen to either accept continuing with McLaren or decide to take a gamble on Toyota - which would likely offer him the most money. An outside possibility, however, is a switch to Renault.
McLaren boss Ron Dennis made it clear at the weekend that he would respect Raikkonen's decision if the Finn, or teammate Juan Pablo Montoya, decided to leave his team at the end of the year
"I believe in freedom of choice, but it's a two way street," said Dennis. "The driver is an important part of the team but, at the end of the day, if we chose we could contract a second driver for 2007 tomorrow, just as Kimi or Juan could sign for another team tomorrow.
"If Kimi or Juan thinks their future is best served by driving for another team that's what they should do. If we think our future is best served by contracting another driver for next year - that's what we'll do."
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]FIA, GPMA divided on standard ECU
By Jonathan Noble Tuesday, March 14th 2006, 11:09 GMT
The chances of a final agreement being reached between the manufacturers and the FIA to head off the threat of a breakaway now depend on a deal over standard ECUs in Formula One, autosport.com has learned.
Although a meeting between FIA president Max Mosley, F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone and representatives of the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association in Bahrain failed to deliver a final deal to secure F1's future, the situation appears to be edging towards a solution.
An optimistic FIA president Max Mosley said after the meeting: "I would be disappointed if we didn't get the manufacturers sorted in the next few weeks, or even by the end of the month."
There appears to be general agreement about the commercial terms on offer to the teams and there is growing unity over the need to cut costs with future F1 technical regulations.
The manufacturers are even believed to support Mosley's plans to open up a short window of opportunity for entries to the 2008 championship to allow talks to begin about framing the future those regulations.
Mosley said about the entry window: "The world council have got to agree but assuming they do we will start on March 24 and finish on March 31.
"They all understand why now. If we are going to make any adjustments to the regulations we need the three months to do it and we can only do it with people who are in the championship.
"If people in the championship want to discuss them we can do that once they've entered. Or they can not enter, wait and see what the regulations are, and then decide."
However, high level sources close to the negotiations have revealed that there remain major differences of opinion between the manufacturers and the FIA over plans for a standard ECU.
It is understood that Mosley held talks with individual manufacturer representatives over the course of the Bahrain Grand Prix weekend and the one consistent area of concern for each of the carmakers was the standard ECU.
The carmakers are believed to be adamant that they do not want standard ECUs in F1, because they believe it will detract from the technological challenge of the sport, while Mosley believes that standard ECUs are best for F1.
It is understood that Mosley has indicated to the manufacturers that he will not compromise on this issue, however, which looks set to cause some fraught talks in hammering out a deal in the next few weeks.
BMW motorsport director Mario Theissen told autosport.com that he hoped discussions over the technical regulations would be conducted in a sensible manner.
"I don't really see a point in a tough fight," he said. "I think one should sit down and think about what is reasonable, what are the interests of the teams, the spectators and certainly the commercial rights holders, and then go for it.
"In my view, let me first say we support cost cutting but we have to look for a balance. For F1 the balance is that it is the pinnacle of motorsport, and it was the FIA who released last year than the fans wants to see technology, but on the other hand we have to get costs under control."[/QUOTE]
| TimStevens | 03-14-2006 08:33 AM |
That'd be interesting to see if Kimi could whip Toyota into shape...
| NYEJ25 | 03-14-2006 09:09 AM |
I would [SIZE=6]LOVE[/SIZE] for Kimi to come to Toyota. I am a big, big Toyota fan. With Kimi in it would insure that they would be competative for many years to come. This is the first I have heard about this, I hope it come true!
| JoD | 03-14-2006 10:32 AM |
[QUOTE=NYEJ25]I would [SIZE=6]LOVE[/SIZE] for Kimi to come to Toyota.[/QUOTE]
PLEASE NO!!!! Despite reliability issues in the past, I still wholeheartedly believe that Kimi should stick with McLaren. It's just a good fit for his personality, and theirs for that matter.
Toyota is too quick to axe their drivers, IMO, blaming them for the lack of results, when I think it is more of the fault of the car.... Granted, I will agree, Ralfie sucks, so go ahead and blame him all you want.
As for the Kimi to Ferrari rumors, man that's just as bad. Let's take a great driver who is known for a non-complaining attitude (i.e. "That's racing") and insert him into the most complain-ey team around. NO THANK YOU!!!
If Kimi does move, and I pray not, I'd hope for Renault or RBR...
PLEASE NO!!!! Despite reliability issues in the past, I still wholeheartedly believe that Kimi should stick with McLaren. It's just a good fit for his personality, and theirs for that matter.
Toyota is too quick to axe their drivers, IMO, blaming them for the lack of results, when I think it is more of the fault of the car.... Granted, I will agree, Ralfie sucks, so go ahead and blame him all you want.
As for the Kimi to Ferrari rumors, man that's just as bad. Let's take a great driver who is known for a non-complaining attitude (i.e. "That's racing") and insert him into the most complain-ey team around. NO THANK YOU!!!
If Kimi does move, and I pray not, I'd hope for Renault or RBR...
| NYEJ25 | 03-14-2006 11:13 AM |
[QUOTE=JoD]PLEASE NO!!!! Despite reliability issues in the past, I still wholeheartedly believe that Kimi should stick with McLaren. It's just a good fit for his personality, and theirs for that matter.
Toyota is too quick to axe their drivers, IMO, blaming them for the lack of results, when I think it is more of the fault of the car.... Granted, I will agree, Ralfie sucks, so go ahead and blame him all you want.
As for the Kimi to Ferrari rumors, man that's just as bad. Let's take a great driver who is known for a non-complaining attitude (i.e. "That's racing") and insert him into the most complain-ey team around. NO THANK YOU!!!
If Kimi does move, and I pray not, I'd hope for Renault or RBR...[/QUOTE]
But who knows if Renault will even be around after 2008. I have serious doubts about thier long term comitment to F1. I think it would be a shame to see Kimi go there and then they stop racing after 2008. Toyota is full on commited to winning a constructors championship, they will stop at nothing to do so. I think they will get thier act together this year and will be towards the top by the end of the season. With Kimi in a seat next year a WDC and a WCC are well within reach. IMHO.
I think Ralf is the biggest joke going, 25 million a year and he got knocked out in the first round of qualifing! He does not deserve his contract and has yet to earn it.
Toyota is too quick to axe their drivers, IMO, blaming them for the lack of results, when I think it is more of the fault of the car.... Granted, I will agree, Ralfie sucks, so go ahead and blame him all you want.
As for the Kimi to Ferrari rumors, man that's just as bad. Let's take a great driver who is known for a non-complaining attitude (i.e. "That's racing") and insert him into the most complain-ey team around. NO THANK YOU!!!
If Kimi does move, and I pray not, I'd hope for Renault or RBR...[/QUOTE]
But who knows if Renault will even be around after 2008. I have serious doubts about thier long term comitment to F1. I think it would be a shame to see Kimi go there and then they stop racing after 2008. Toyota is full on commited to winning a constructors championship, they will stop at nothing to do so. I think they will get thier act together this year and will be towards the top by the end of the season. With Kimi in a seat next year a WDC and a WCC are well within reach. IMHO.
I think Ralf is the biggest joke going, 25 million a year and he got knocked out in the first round of qualifing! He does not deserve his contract and has yet to earn it.
| JoD | 03-14-2006 12:00 PM |
Oh this is just craptastic! First no Eau Rouge this year, and now maybe no 130R for next year!!!
[URL]http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=112092[/URL] :mad:
[URL]http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=112092[/URL] :mad:
| artkevin | 03-14-2006 12:48 PM |
[QUOTE=JoD]Oh this is just craptastic! First no Eau Rouge this year, and now maybe no 130R for next year!!!
[URL]http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=112092[/URL] :mad:[/QUOTE]
Son of a Bleep! :mad:
[URL]http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=112092[/URL] :mad:[/QUOTE]
Son of a Bleep! :mad:
| Ferg | 03-14-2006 12:52 PM |
[QUOTE=JoD]Oh this is just craptastic! First no Eau Rouge this year, and now maybe no 130R for next year!!!
[URL]http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=112092[/URL] :mad:[/QUOTE]
Yeah that sucks.
I feel like it's been in the works ever since Toyota joined the Championship...
I guess the good news is that Bernie doesn't want to lose Suzuka...so maybe with one (or more) of the European races falling away we'll get both Fuji and Suzuka...so Toyota and Honda can both have a home race.
[URL]http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=112092[/URL] :mad:[/QUOTE]
Yeah that sucks.
I feel like it's been in the works ever since Toyota joined the Championship...
I guess the good news is that Bernie doesn't want to lose Suzuka...so maybe with one (or more) of the European races falling away we'll get both Fuji and Suzuka...so Toyota and Honda can both have a home race.
| BriDrive | 03-14-2006 01:02 PM |
I wonder if Super Aguri will push hard for Motegi :lol:
OK...lame ...sorry...
Suzuka is certainly one of my personal favorites, but I only drive prototypes in PS2....
Autosport had an article on this in early February IIRC.
BriDrive
OK...lame ...sorry...
Suzuka is certainly one of my personal favorites, but I only drive prototypes in PS2....
Autosport had an article on this in early February IIRC.
BriDrive
| Ferg | 03-14-2006 01:29 PM |
[QUOTE=BriDrive]Autosport had an article on this in early February IIRC.
[/QUOTE]
I'm sure they did, they've been predicting a move to Fuji ever since Toyota came on board. I'm hoping this is one of those rare cases where Autosport gets it wrong...
Personally I would be devastated to lose Suzuka. Fuji is a great track, if maybe a little emascualted, but it's nowhere near as classic a circuit as Suzuka.
Of course there's a precident to having two races in Japan...anyone remember the pair of "Pacific Grand Prix" that were held at TI Aida back in the early 90's? Talk about a track completely unsuited to hosting a Formula One machine... :eek:
[/QUOTE]
I'm sure they did, they've been predicting a move to Fuji ever since Toyota came on board. I'm hoping this is one of those rare cases where Autosport gets it wrong...
Personally I would be devastated to lose Suzuka. Fuji is a great track, if maybe a little emascualted, but it's nowhere near as classic a circuit as Suzuka.
Of course there's a precident to having two races in Japan...anyone remember the pair of "Pacific Grand Prix" that were held at TI Aida back in the early 90's? Talk about a track completely unsuited to hosting a Formula One machine... :eek:
| TimStevens | 03-14-2006 01:31 PM |
Man, I love Suzuka... I'd be ticked if it falls off the calendar.
| BriDrive | 03-14-2006 01:45 PM |
Not to beat it to death of course, but here's a brief Japanese article which sort of lays it out as of 11 March: [url]http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/sports/20060312TDY21007.htm[/url]
The long straight at Fuji should still provide some spectacle...
The long straight at Fuji should still provide some spectacle...
| [email�protected] | 03-14-2006 01:47 PM |
[QUOTE=TimStevens]Man, I love Suzuka... I'd be ticked if it falls off the calendar.[/QUOTE]
I was ticked when SPA was dumped ...... but, that's only because I was there last summer (not for the F1 race) but, the personal connection is still valid though
I was ticked when SPA was dumped ...... but, that's only because I was there last summer (not for the F1 race) but, the personal connection is still valid though
| Ferg | 03-15-2006 08:20 AM |
I wish I could make something up this crazy...
[QUOTE]Rossi challenges Alonso to duel
Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 11:53 GMT
MotoGP champion Valentino Rossi has challenged Formula One champion Fernando Alonso to a high-speed duel to see who is quickest.
The 24-year-old Renault driver said last month he was unimpressed by Rossi's Formula One tests for Ferrari and felt it would be very hard for him to switch from two wheels to four.
"He might finish fifth or even get on the podium some time but I could do the same on the bikes if I was given enough time to practise," the Spaniard told a news conference.
The words appeared to have stung Rossi, who was quoted by British weekly Motorcycle News on Wednesday as saying he wanted to put Alonso to the test.
"I read that if Alonso is able to make some practice then he can put a MotoGP bike on the podium with me," said the 27-year-old Italian.
"Well, I think we should drive a Formula One car, a World Rally car and a MotoGP bike, add the times together and then we will see who is the fastest."
Alonso told Gazzetta dello Sport that he was ready for it.
"Valentino triple challenges me? I find it something very enjoyable. So I reply I'm ready for it."
Rossi, winner in motorcycling's top category for the past five years, has tested repeatedly for Ferrari including a session in February with other drivers.
The charismatic Italian has also competed in rallies and Ferrari's seven times world champion Michael Schumacher has said Italy's highest-paid sportsman has the talent to make the switch to Formula One.
Alonso won Formula One's season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix at the weekend. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Rossi challenges Alonso to duel
Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 11:53 GMT
MotoGP champion Valentino Rossi has challenged Formula One champion Fernando Alonso to a high-speed duel to see who is quickest.
The 24-year-old Renault driver said last month he was unimpressed by Rossi's Formula One tests for Ferrari and felt it would be very hard for him to switch from two wheels to four.
"He might finish fifth or even get on the podium some time but I could do the same on the bikes if I was given enough time to practise," the Spaniard told a news conference.
The words appeared to have stung Rossi, who was quoted by British weekly Motorcycle News on Wednesday as saying he wanted to put Alonso to the test.
"I read that if Alonso is able to make some practice then he can put a MotoGP bike on the podium with me," said the 27-year-old Italian.
"Well, I think we should drive a Formula One car, a World Rally car and a MotoGP bike, add the times together and then we will see who is the fastest."
Alonso told Gazzetta dello Sport that he was ready for it.
"Valentino triple challenges me? I find it something very enjoyable. So I reply I'm ready for it."
Rossi, winner in motorcycling's top category for the past five years, has tested repeatedly for Ferrari including a session in February with other drivers.
The charismatic Italian has also competed in rallies and Ferrari's seven times world champion Michael Schumacher has said Italy's highest-paid sportsman has the talent to make the switch to Formula One.
Alonso won Formula One's season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix at the weekend. [/QUOTE]
| MattDell | 03-15-2006 08:35 AM |
^I'd like to see who'd foot the bill for that challenge.
| StuBeck | 03-15-2006 08:55 AM |
Spa was dumped because they couldn't afford to pay. Suzuka will probably stay I think. Both German tracks are having issues with staying afloat so I think the European GP may go away, go to an alternating schedule for the German GP and finish up the season at the Japanese and Pacific GP.
| Ferg | 03-15-2006 09:51 AM |
[i]*didn't want this to get lost on page 22...*[/i]
I wish I could make something up this crazy...
[QUOTE]Rossi challenges Alonso to duel
Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 11:53 GMT
MotoGP champion Valentino Rossi has challenged Formula One champion Fernando Alonso to a high-speed duel to see who is quickest.
The 24-year-old Renault driver said last month he was unimpressed by Rossi's Formula One tests for Ferrari and felt it would be very hard for him to switch from two wheels to four.
"He might finish fifth or even get on the podium some time but I could do the same on the bikes if I was given enough time to practise," the Spaniard told a news conference.
The words appeared to have stung Rossi, who was quoted by British weekly Motorcycle News on Wednesday as saying he wanted to put Alonso to the test.
"I read that if Alonso is able to make some practice then he can put a MotoGP bike on the podium with me," said the 27-year-old Italian.
"Well, I think we should drive a Formula One car, a World Rally car and a MotoGP bike, add the times together and then we will see who is the fastest."
Alonso told Gazzetta dello Sport that he was ready for it.
"Valentino triple challenges me? I find it something very enjoyable. So I reply I'm ready for it."
Rossi, winner in motorcycling's top category for the past five years, has tested repeatedly for Ferrari including a session in February with other drivers.
The charismatic Italian has also competed in rallies and Ferrari's seven times world champion Michael Schumacher has said Italy's highest-paid sportsman has the talent to make the switch to Formula One.
Alonso won Formula One's season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix at the weekend. [/QUOTE]
I wish I could make something up this crazy...
[QUOTE]Rossi challenges Alonso to duel
Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 11:53 GMT
MotoGP champion Valentino Rossi has challenged Formula One champion Fernando Alonso to a high-speed duel to see who is quickest.
The 24-year-old Renault driver said last month he was unimpressed by Rossi's Formula One tests for Ferrari and felt it would be very hard for him to switch from two wheels to four.
"He might finish fifth or even get on the podium some time but I could do the same on the bikes if I was given enough time to practise," the Spaniard told a news conference.
The words appeared to have stung Rossi, who was quoted by British weekly Motorcycle News on Wednesday as saying he wanted to put Alonso to the test.
"I read that if Alonso is able to make some practice then he can put a MotoGP bike on the podium with me," said the 27-year-old Italian.
"Well, I think we should drive a Formula One car, a World Rally car and a MotoGP bike, add the times together and then we will see who is the fastest."
Alonso told Gazzetta dello Sport that he was ready for it.
"Valentino triple challenges me? I find it something very enjoyable. So I reply I'm ready for it."
Rossi, winner in motorcycling's top category for the past five years, has tested repeatedly for Ferrari including a session in February with other drivers.
The charismatic Italian has also competed in rallies and Ferrari's seven times world champion Michael Schumacher has said Italy's highest-paid sportsman has the talent to make the switch to Formula One.
Alonso won Formula One's season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix at the weekend. [/QUOTE]
| Ferg | 03-15-2006 09:51 AM |
[QUOTE=MattDell]^I'd like to see who'd foot the bill for that challenge.[/QUOTE]
I'd PayPal Bernie five bucks if it would help make this happen :D
I'd PayPal Bernie five bucks if it would help make this happen :D
| Ferg | 03-15-2006 09:56 AM |
News..
[QUOTE]Williams still linked with Toyota engines
By Jonathan Noble Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 09:55 GMT
Williams remain linked with a possible switch to Toyota engines next year, despite the impressive start to their relationship with Cosworth at Bahrain last weekend.
Although Mark Webber and Nico Rosberg both finished in the points at Sakhir, with the latter claiming fastest lap, it is understood that the team are continuing talks with Toyota about a customer deal for 2007.
Sources have revealed to autosport.com that Toyota's engine chief Luca Marmorini and manager of car design Pascal Vasselon held a meeting with Williams co-owner Patrick Head one evening at the Bahrain Grand Prix to begin preliminary discussions about the technical issues relating to a future partnership.
Despite those talks, however, it is understood that Williams have not signed a deal with Toyota yet and that there is still a chance that Cosworth could still remain with the team if they continue to shine.
Williams chiefs made it clear in Bahrain last weekend that they were very impressed with the work that Cosworth had done over the winter.
"I personally think they have got the best engine on the grid and whether that gives us a harder time to develop the tyre or the set-up or aero, fine," said technical director Sam Michael. "But you have got to take your hat off to them to produce an engine that revs to 19,000rpm and is as solid as a rock. They did a really, really good job."
However, the ultimate decision may well come down to whether Williams can afford to remain an independent customer team or if it would make better financial sense to join up with a manufacturer who would likely subsidise the cost of power-units.
Cosworth's managing director Tim Routsis said at the Williams launch earlier this year that he was determined to make it difficult for the team to choose to change engine partners.
"My job as head of Cosworth is to deliver the sort of performance in the early part of the year that makes it bloody hard for Williams to want to go anywhere else," he said.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Williams still linked with Toyota engines
By Jonathan Noble Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 09:55 GMT
Williams remain linked with a possible switch to Toyota engines next year, despite the impressive start to their relationship with Cosworth at Bahrain last weekend.
Although Mark Webber and Nico Rosberg both finished in the points at Sakhir, with the latter claiming fastest lap, it is understood that the team are continuing talks with Toyota about a customer deal for 2007.
Sources have revealed to autosport.com that Toyota's engine chief Luca Marmorini and manager of car design Pascal Vasselon held a meeting with Williams co-owner Patrick Head one evening at the Bahrain Grand Prix to begin preliminary discussions about the technical issues relating to a future partnership.
Despite those talks, however, it is understood that Williams have not signed a deal with Toyota yet and that there is still a chance that Cosworth could still remain with the team if they continue to shine.
Williams chiefs made it clear in Bahrain last weekend that they were very impressed with the work that Cosworth had done over the winter.
"I personally think they have got the best engine on the grid and whether that gives us a harder time to develop the tyre or the set-up or aero, fine," said technical director Sam Michael. "But you have got to take your hat off to them to produce an engine that revs to 19,000rpm and is as solid as a rock. They did a really, really good job."
However, the ultimate decision may well come down to whether Williams can afford to remain an independent customer team or if it would make better financial sense to join up with a manufacturer who would likely subsidise the cost of power-units.
Cosworth's managing director Tim Routsis said at the Williams launch earlier this year that he was determined to make it difficult for the team to choose to change engine partners.
"My job as head of Cosworth is to deliver the sort of performance in the early part of the year that makes it bloody hard for Williams to want to go anywhere else," he said.[/QUOTE]
| Bonzo | 03-15-2006 11:34 AM |
Wow! Rossi vs Alonso. Whos says world champions don't have confidence. :banana:
F1. FA will edge out VR
Rally. A toss up. Edge to Vale.
motoGP. FA does not have even a remote chance to get close to Valetino. Bikes are in a whole different league.
F1. FA will edge out VR
Rally. A toss up. Edge to Vale.
motoGP. FA does not have even a remote chance to get close to Valetino. Bikes are in a whole different league.
| Student Driver | 03-15-2006 12:25 PM |
Huh? Dunno if this is true, but...
[url]http://www.sportnetwork.net/main/s85/st92531.htm?fromrss=1[/url]
[quote]Schumacher and Raikkonen Sign For Ferrari In 2007
Dale Calkins
Reports suggest that both Kimi Raikkonen and Michael Schumacher have signed to race for Ferrari in 2007. According to Germany's Bild publication, with Schumacher signing on for an additional two years, Kimi and Michael will form a dream team at the Scuderia.
It has been suggested for quite some time that Kimi Raikkonen will be heading to Ferrari and it has even been suggested that he signed a contract with the Scuderia months ago. As for Schumacher, it would be no surprise really if he decided to stay on with Ferrari, considering his serious devotion to the team and their recent return to the top.
While both signings have yet to be confirmed, they are likely true. Stay tuned to Ferrari to see if Schumacher and Raikkonen will indeed drive for Ferrari in 2007. [/quote]
[url]http://www.sportnetwork.net/main/s85/st92531.htm?fromrss=1[/url]
[quote]Schumacher and Raikkonen Sign For Ferrari In 2007
Dale Calkins
Reports suggest that both Kimi Raikkonen and Michael Schumacher have signed to race for Ferrari in 2007. According to Germany's Bild publication, with Schumacher signing on for an additional two years, Kimi and Michael will form a dream team at the Scuderia.
It has been suggested for quite some time that Kimi Raikkonen will be heading to Ferrari and it has even been suggested that he signed a contract with the Scuderia months ago. As for Schumacher, it would be no surprise really if he decided to stay on with Ferrari, considering his serious devotion to the team and their recent return to the top.
While both signings have yet to be confirmed, they are likely true. Stay tuned to Ferrari to see if Schumacher and Raikkonen will indeed drive for Ferrari in 2007. [/quote]
| Ferg | 03-15-2006 12:29 PM |
Eh, the "reports' have been suggesting a move to Ferrari by Kimi for the past year or so.
Not saying it won't happen of course, just that it's nothing but speculation at this point, and old speculation at that.
Until I hear it from all parties involved it will only be a rumor.
:)
Not saying it won't happen of course, just that it's nothing but speculation at this point, and old speculation at that.
Until I hear it from all parties involved it will only be a rumor.
:)
| Ferg | 03-15-2006 01:45 PM |
Max still playing hardball..
[QUOTE]Mosley pressing ahead with entry window
By Jonathan Noble Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 16:43 GMT
Max Mosley has warned Formula One's manufacturers that there will be no backing down over his plans for a limited 'window of opportunity' for entries to the 2008 world championship later this month, autosport.com can reveal.
Although the sport appears to be heading towards a deal that will head off the threat of a manufacturers' breakaway following meetings at the Bahrain Grand Prix, the FIA president has written to Formula One's teams insisting there is no change in the FIA's entry window procedure.
There were suggestions in the Bahrain paddock that plans to open entries for 2008 on March 24 and close them on March 31 could be made more flexible in light of an imminent deal with the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association, but this speculation appears to be wide of the mark.
In a letter that Mosley sent to the teams on Wednesday, a copy of which has been obtained by autosport.com, the FIA president confirmed that he was pressing ahead with the one-week entry window.
He insists that it is necessary if the FIA are to frame the sport's 2008 regulations in co-operation with the teams - and he makes it clear that no team or manufacturer will be given special dispensation if they miss the entry window.
Those teams who fail to submit an entry in time will be frozen out of talks on the future rules, even if their entry for 2008 is accepted at a later date.
"A Formula One team which does not enter before 31 March would nevertheless be able to submit an entry at a later date and such an entry might be accepted by the FIA subject to the relevant sporting regulations and provided the number of teams did not exceed twelve, including the late entry," wrote Mosley.
"However, unless the FIA and the Competing Teams are persuaded that extenuating circumstances apply, even where such a late entry is accepted by the FIA prior to 30 June, late entering teams will not be invited to join in any discussions regarding the finalisation of the Sporting Regulations and entry will only be possible on the basis that the team accepts the Sporting Regulations as finally adopted and published prior to 30 June."
Mosley is hoping that the FIA World Council will approve his window of opportunity plan at their next meeting on March 22.
If they do, then once the entries are closed the FIA plans to begin a series of meetings with the teams to finalise the future F1 regulations. The technical regulations need to be sorted before June 30 this year to give teams enough time to design their 2008 cars.
McLaren boss Ron Dennis, who has been central to the discussions between the GPMA, the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone, said in Bahrain last weekend that he was hopeful the manufacturers situation would be resolved before the entry deadline closed but said there was no fixed position from them about entries.
When asked about the GPMA's position towards the deadline, he said: "This is an almost day-by-day process now and I don't think anyone can present a situation where there is no signed-off MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) by that point.
"I don't want to be at all predictive but I expect there will be several meetings before that day and one of those meetings will be to decide what the position will be if we find ourselves in that situation. But there is no dialogue on that yet."
Speaking about the FIA's position with regards to the entry window, an FIA spokesman said: "The FIA's position with regards to the entry of the 2008 championship has been very clearly communicated to the current teams."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Mosley pressing ahead with entry window
By Jonathan Noble Wednesday, March 15th 2006, 16:43 GMT
Max Mosley has warned Formula One's manufacturers that there will be no backing down over his plans for a limited 'window of opportunity' for entries to the 2008 world championship later this month, autosport.com can reveal.
Although the sport appears to be heading towards a deal that will head off the threat of a manufacturers' breakaway following meetings at the Bahrain Grand Prix, the FIA president has written to Formula One's teams insisting there is no change in the FIA's entry window procedure.
There were suggestions in the Bahrain paddock that plans to open entries for 2008 on March 24 and close them on March 31 could be made more flexible in light of an imminent deal with the Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association, but this speculation appears to be wide of the mark.
In a letter that Mosley sent to the teams on Wednesday, a copy of which has been obtained by autosport.com, the FIA president confirmed that he was pressing ahead with the one-week entry window.
He insists that it is necessary if the FIA are to frame the sport's 2008 regulations in co-operation with the teams - and he makes it clear that no team or manufacturer will be given special dispensation if they miss the entry window.
Those teams who fail to submit an entry in time will be frozen out of talks on the future rules, even if their entry for 2008 is accepted at a later date.
"A Formula One team which does not enter before 31 March would nevertheless be able to submit an entry at a later date and such an entry might be accepted by the FIA subject to the relevant sporting regulations and provided the number of teams did not exceed twelve, including the late entry," wrote Mosley.
"However, unless the FIA and the Competing Teams are persuaded that extenuating circumstances apply, even where such a late entry is accepted by the FIA prior to 30 June, late entering teams will not be invited to join in any discussions regarding the finalisation of the Sporting Regulations and entry will only be possible on the basis that the team accepts the Sporting Regulations as finally adopted and published prior to 30 June."
Mosley is hoping that the FIA World Council will approve his window of opportunity plan at their next meeting on March 22.
If they do, then once the entries are closed the FIA plans to begin a series of meetings with the teams to finalise the future F1 regulations. The technical regulations need to be sorted before June 30 this year to give teams enough time to design their 2008 cars.
McLaren boss Ron Dennis, who has been central to the discussions between the GPMA, the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone, said in Bahrain last weekend that he was hopeful the manufacturers situation would be resolved before the entry deadline closed but said there was no fixed position from them about entries.
When asked about the GPMA's position towards the deadline, he said: "This is an almost day-by-day process now and I don't think anyone can present a situation where there is no signed-off MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) by that point.
"I don't want to be at all predictive but I expect there will be several meetings before that day and one of those meetings will be to decide what the position will be if we find ourselves in that situation. But there is no dialogue on that yet."
Speaking about the FIA's position with regards to the entry window, an FIA spokesman said: "The FIA's position with regards to the entry of the 2008 championship has been very clearly communicated to the current teams."[/QUOTE]
| davidmjh | 03-15-2006 02:37 PM |
forumla 1, im so glad its back, makes me sad through the closed season but its back back back :lol:
| JoD | 03-15-2006 11:26 PM |
Hell has officially frozen over...
10 mintues ago while watching the Daily Show, I saw an intel commercial featuring ol' Jacques... He spoke, a lot while sitting on some guy's lap...
They talked about downforce and Monaco... I don't remember much else because I was so damned dumbfounded by the whole thing. Tried to find it online but no such luck...
Even though 90% of America will have no idea who he is, I'm glad to see F1 in a mainstream ad! :banana:
10 mintues ago while watching the Daily Show, I saw an intel commercial featuring ol' Jacques... He spoke, a lot while sitting on some guy's lap...
They talked about downforce and Monaco... I don't remember much else because I was so damned dumbfounded by the whole thing. Tried to find it online but no such luck...
Even though 90% of America will have no idea who he is, I'm glad to see F1 in a mainstream ad! :banana:
| TimStevens | 03-16-2006 07:52 AM |
Hrm... gonna have to keep my eyes open while I'm FF'ing through the commercials tonight!
| JoD | 03-16-2006 09:24 AM |
[QUOTE=TimStevens]Hrm... gonna have to keep my eyes open while I'm FF'ing through the commercials tonight![/QUOTE]
Yeah, after doing some research, I found out there are a series of 3 commercials featuring Jacques, Mariah Carey and Elijah Wood. (What a bizarre mix!) The commercials are supposed to be featured on ESPN and E!, but I saw it on Comedy Central - so who knows!
I'm not a JV fan, but yeah F1 exposure!
Yeah, after doing some research, I found out there are a series of 3 commercials featuring Jacques, Mariah Carey and Elijah Wood. (What a bizarre mix!) The commercials are supposed to be featured on ESPN and E!, but I saw it on Comedy Central - so who knows!
I'm not a JV fan, but yeah F1 exposure!
| BriDrive | 03-16-2006 02:22 PM |
I saw the E. Wood one last night.
Frankly, it was a bit uncomfortable to see Frodo sitting on her lap on the plane...asking for pop-corn....
Frankly, it was a bit uncomfortable to see Frodo sitting on her lap on the plane...asking for pop-corn....
| finnRex | 03-16-2006 09:43 PM |
[QUOTE=Ferg]Until I hear it from all parties involved it will only be a rumor.
:)[/QUOTE]
I agree 100%.
Mika(if anywhere, Kimi, please go to Renault. at least you'll have 2 years of reliable engines:) )
:)[/QUOTE]
I agree 100%.
Mika(if anywhere, Kimi, please go to Renault. at least you'll have 2 years of reliable engines:) )
| jpsimon | 03-16-2006 09:48 PM |
id rather see kimi and schumi than kimi and alonso
| jpsimon | 03-16-2006 09:54 PM |
In other news.... here is a spy shot of next years new tire rules... 2" wide tires... so much safer.
[img]http://jonahsimon.com/public_photo/f1live/02malaysia/pre/race8.jpg[/img]
[img]http://jonahsimon.com/public_photo/f1live/02malaysia/pre/race8.jpg[/img]
| finnRex | 03-16-2006 10:02 PM |
[QUOTE=jpsimon]id rather see kimi and schumi than kimi and alonso[/QUOTE]
Why is that? Do you not like Alonso, or is it 'cuz Schumi is that darn good, and he could teach this young whipper snapper a thing or two?
Mika
Why is that? Do you not like Alonso, or is it 'cuz Schumi is that darn good, and he could teach this young whipper snapper a thing or two?
Mika
| jpsimon | 03-16-2006 10:19 PM |
uh no. maybe because ferrari is my team, but i am a huge kimi fan.. so id really like to see kimi on ferrari with schumi.
| finnRex | 03-16-2006 11:10 PM |
One good thing would happen with Ferrari and Kimi. Kimi would FINALLY get a reliable car. I'm getting frustrated with McLaren. Dang they can make quick, but can they make reliable? The jury is still out...
Mika
Mika
| Ferg | 03-17-2006 08:34 AM |
Still some doubt in F1 when it comes to the fate of Italians...
[QUOTE]Court upholds temporary Monza ban
By Michele Lostia Friday, March 17th 2006, 10:52 GMT
An Italian civil court magistrate confirmed yesterday a temporary ban on testing and racing at Monza for cars lacking a suitable noise-reduction system.
The ruling reiterates a similar decision taken last November, which followed a formal complaint filed in 2001 by a group of local residents over the track's noise levels.
Last week's hearing came after an out-of-court settlement between the autodrome and the Monza residents could not be reached.
According to Gazzetta dello Sport, the Monza residents were willing to accept a reduction of noisy activity at the track from the current 75 days per year to 60, but the managers of the circuit deemed the restriction too severe and rejected the arrangement.
Monza autodrome director Enrico Ferrari, however, remains cautiously confident. "The main competitions will take place, but a rethinking over the future of Monza will be necessary."
The Formula One Italian Grand Prix is scheduled to take place at Monza on September 10th.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Briatore: no rush over Fisichella's future
By Damien Smith Friday, March 17th 2006, 09:58 GMT
Giancarlo Fisichella has been told that he has at least until the start of the European season to convince Renault bosses that he is worth keeping for next year.
The Italian endured a frustrating 2005 campaign with the team, as poor reliability wrecked his chances of fighting for the title, and had hoped that the new season would bring improved fortunes.
However, his year got off to the worst possible start when engine problems ruined his Bahrain Grand Prix weekend and left him unable to show what he could really do.
Renault boss Flavio Briatore insists, however, that a decision about Fisichella's future has not been taken yet - and claims the team are not in a rush to choose a replacement for Fernando Alonso.
"We have a very competitive team, so we need to find the right drivers," said Briatore at Sepang. "We'll see what happens.
"Fisichella's problems in Bahrain were completely our fault, we blame ourselves. We'll see how he is after three or four races. It is his second year with the team after a difficult season last year. We have plenty of time.
"We also have (test driver, Heikki) Kovalainen and we are pleased with him. Anything can happen."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Court upholds temporary Monza ban
By Michele Lostia Friday, March 17th 2006, 10:52 GMT
An Italian civil court magistrate confirmed yesterday a temporary ban on testing and racing at Monza for cars lacking a suitable noise-reduction system.
The ruling reiterates a similar decision taken last November, which followed a formal complaint filed in 2001 by a group of local residents over the track's noise levels.
Last week's hearing came after an out-of-court settlement between the autodrome and the Monza residents could not be reached.
According to Gazzetta dello Sport, the Monza residents were willing to accept a reduction of noisy activity at the track from the current 75 days per year to 60, but the managers of the circuit deemed the restriction too severe and rejected the arrangement.
Monza autodrome director Enrico Ferrari, however, remains cautiously confident. "The main competitions will take place, but a rethinking over the future of Monza will be necessary."
The Formula One Italian Grand Prix is scheduled to take place at Monza on September 10th.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Briatore: no rush over Fisichella's future
By Damien Smith Friday, March 17th 2006, 09:58 GMT
Giancarlo Fisichella has been told that he has at least until the start of the European season to convince Renault bosses that he is worth keeping for next year.
The Italian endured a frustrating 2005 campaign with the team, as poor reliability wrecked his chances of fighting for the title, and had hoped that the new season would bring improved fortunes.
However, his year got off to the worst possible start when engine problems ruined his Bahrain Grand Prix weekend and left him unable to show what he could really do.
Renault boss Flavio Briatore insists, however, that a decision about Fisichella's future has not been taken yet - and claims the team are not in a rush to choose a replacement for Fernando Alonso.
"We have a very competitive team, so we need to find the right drivers," said Briatore at Sepang. "We'll see what happens.
"Fisichella's problems in Bahrain were completely our fault, we blame ourselves. We'll see how he is after three or four races. It is his second year with the team after a difficult season last year. We have plenty of time.
"We also have (test driver, Heikki) Kovalainen and we are pleased with him. Anything can happen."[/QUOTE]
| Bonzo | 03-17-2006 08:53 AM |
hehe, F1 cars with mufflers. As crazy as this sounds it's gonna happen sooner or later. Unfortunately sound is a big spectacle and marketing factor in F1. Go to an F1 race and look around and see all the ppl holding [B]out[/B] their cell phones for ppl on the other end. I've did it myself :p
Every race course in the world is under the same scrutiny. Many already have sound restrictions and are having a bit of a challenge to meet them.
Monza would be the last place I would have imagined having trouble.
Some ppl just don't appreciate beautiful music.
Every race course in the world is under the same scrutiny. Many already have sound restrictions and are having a bit of a challenge to meet them.
Monza would be the last place I would have imagined having trouble.
Some ppl just don't appreciate beautiful music.
| JoD | 03-17-2006 09:05 AM |
The whole thing is absolutely ludicrous to me. Most of the people probably haven't lived in the "neighborhood" as long as there have been F1 races going on there. You can't tell me you didn't know that noise was a possibility when you bought the place.
Friends of mine who design hospitals tell me all the time that neighborhood people complain about the ambulance sirens. In every instance, the hospital had been there longer than the people had owned the house. If you don't want to be bothered by ambulance sirens, don't move close to a hospital!! Just like if you don't want to be bothered by the noise of airplanes, stay away from an airport.
Wah - get a life people!
Friends of mine who design hospitals tell me all the time that neighborhood people complain about the ambulance sirens. In every instance, the hospital had been there longer than the people had owned the house. If you don't want to be bothered by ambulance sirens, don't move close to a hospital!! Just like if you don't want to be bothered by the noise of airplanes, stay away from an airport.
Wah - get a life people!
| Ferg | 03-17-2006 11:55 AM |
As ludicrous as the Monza debate is, it's nothing compared to this...
[QUOTE]Alonso's posturing upsets PETA
Friday, March 17th 2006, 15:00 GMT
Animal rights organization PETA are again attempting to gain publicity for animal rights - but they have picked the wrong example.
Indian MP Maneka Gandhi, on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, has interpreted Fernando Alonso's posturing during the Bahrain Grand Prix as a mimicking of the motions of a bullfighter.
Gandhi has therefore written a letter criticising Formula One's world champion.
The Renault driver was seen posturing on top of his car and on the podium after finishing the Sakhir event, and, after the Spaniard refused to explain the move, speculation has been rife about the possible explanation.
The posturing, however, is believed to have nothing to do with bullfighting, and Spanish media claim Alonso's move was an imitation of actor Jim Carrey in the movie How the Grinch Stole Christmas.
Gandhi said attempting to glorify bullifight offends millions of opponents of animal abuse.
"The torment of a living being and his subsequent repeated stabbing and often slow death, as well as the removal of his ears, is barbaric and no longer acceptable by any humane standards", wrote Gandhi.
"Even in Spain, awareness is growing fast, and some towns have already banned this crude, cruel and cowardly spectacle."
In the past, PETA had called to ban the habit of drinking milk at the Indianapolis 500 podium because it was a "beverage born out of cruelty to baby calves" and a "racist drink." [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Alonso's posturing upsets PETA
Friday, March 17th 2006, 15:00 GMT
Animal rights organization PETA are again attempting to gain publicity for animal rights - but they have picked the wrong example.
Indian MP Maneka Gandhi, on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, has interpreted Fernando Alonso's posturing during the Bahrain Grand Prix as a mimicking of the motions of a bullfighter.
Gandhi has therefore written a letter criticising Formula One's world champion.
The Renault driver was seen posturing on top of his car and on the podium after finishing the Sakhir event, and, after the Spaniard refused to explain the move, speculation has been rife about the possible explanation.
The posturing, however, is believed to have nothing to do with bullfighting, and Spanish media claim Alonso's move was an imitation of actor Jim Carrey in the movie How the Grinch Stole Christmas.
Gandhi said attempting to glorify bullifight offends millions of opponents of animal abuse.
"The torment of a living being and his subsequent repeated stabbing and often slow death, as well as the removal of his ears, is barbaric and no longer acceptable by any humane standards", wrote Gandhi.
"Even in Spain, awareness is growing fast, and some towns have already banned this crude, cruel and cowardly spectacle."
In the past, PETA had called to ban the habit of drinking milk at the Indianapolis 500 podium because it was a "beverage born out of cruelty to baby calves" and a "racist drink." [/QUOTE]
| Harvey_Mushman | 03-17-2006 12:17 PM |
People for the Eating of Tasty Animals
| Tkacik | 03-17-2006 12:23 PM |
Dumb.
| JoD | 03-17-2006 12:28 PM |
[QUOTE=STiTkacik]Dumb.[/QUOTE]
12345
12345
| artkevin | 03-17-2006 01:24 PM |
Quick, someone photochop a pic of Alonso stabbing the STR car!
| finnRex | 03-17-2006 03:28 PM |
Wow. I'd like to meet Mr. Gandhi, and eat steak and eggs in front of him..
Mika
Mika
| Ferg | 03-17-2006 11:10 PM |
So if Kimi doesn't jump ship (or even if he he does...) where oh where would Mr Montoya end up...
[QUOTE]Montoya a "possibility" for Red Bull
By Damien Smith Saturday, March 18th 2006, 03:34 GMT
Dietrich Mateschitz has fuelled talk of Juan Pablo Montoya making a switch to Red Bull Racing for 2007.
The owner of the energy drinks giant told Bild that the Colombian is a "possibility" for his team next year. Montoya's relations with McLaren are said to have become strained since the signing of Fernando Alonso for next year.
Red Bull team boss Christian Horner played down any suggestion that a deal with Montoya is already in the bag.
"It depends on Juan's options for next year and on McLaren," Horner said. "If he doesn't stay at McLaren, how many other teams can he go to?
"The question for us is whether he is a better prospect than the drivers we have at the moment. We are happy with David [Coulthard], and Christian [Klien] would be entering his third season next year."
McLaren appear to favour a 2007 line-up of Alonso and Kimi Raikkonen, if the Finn does not move to Ferrari. Only a limited number of teams would be a realistic option for a top-line driver of Montoya's calibre: Red Bull, BMW and Toyota.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Montoya a "possibility" for Red Bull
By Damien Smith Saturday, March 18th 2006, 03:34 GMT
Dietrich Mateschitz has fuelled talk of Juan Pablo Montoya making a switch to Red Bull Racing for 2007.
The owner of the energy drinks giant told Bild that the Colombian is a "possibility" for his team next year. Montoya's relations with McLaren are said to have become strained since the signing of Fernando Alonso for next year.
Red Bull team boss Christian Horner played down any suggestion that a deal with Montoya is already in the bag.
"It depends on Juan's options for next year and on McLaren," Horner said. "If he doesn't stay at McLaren, how many other teams can he go to?
"The question for us is whether he is a better prospect than the drivers we have at the moment. We are happy with David [Coulthard], and Christian [Klien] would be entering his third season next year."
McLaren appear to favour a 2007 line-up of Alonso and Kimi Raikkonen, if the Finn does not move to Ferrari. Only a limited number of teams would be a realistic option for a top-line driver of Montoya's calibre: Red Bull, BMW and Toyota.
[/QUOTE]
| Ferg | 03-20-2006 09:58 AM |
BAH!!!!
[QUOTE]Fuji secures Japanese GP deal
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 20th 2006, 13:22 GMT
The Fuji circuit has finally concluded its deal to secure the Japanese Grand Prix from 2007 following negotiations in Malaysia last weekend, autosport.com has learned.
It still appears, however, that current holder Suzuka may retain a Formula One race itself.
F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone agreed a deal with Fuji chairman and former Toyota executive vice president Dr. Akihiko Saito in Sepang last weekend, ending months of speculation that the Toyota-owned circuit would poach the Japanese GP away from Suzuka.
It is understood that the deal will not be officially announced until Fuji has sorted out other issues relating to the race, including transport and circuit infrastructure like hotels. The date of the event, which has been agreed between Ecclestone and Dr. Saito, will also be announced then.
Despite the Fuji deal, it is understood that Suzuka has not given up hope of continuing to host a Grand Prix and talks are underway to discuss the possibility. Although Fuji will have the Japanese Grand Prix, an alternative title is being considered for Suzuka.
In 1994 and 1995, the Aida circuit hosted the Pacific Grand Prix and this title is one option for Suzuka.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Fuji secures Japanese GP deal
By Jonathan Noble Monday, March 20th 2006, 13:22 GMT
The Fuji circuit has finally concluded its deal to secure the Japanese Grand Prix from 2007 following negotiations in Malaysia last weekend, autosport.com has learned.
It still appears, however, that current holder Suzuka may retain a Formula One race itself.
F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone agreed a deal with Fuji chairman and former Toyota executive vice president Dr. Akihiko Saito in Sepang last weekend, ending months of speculation that the Toyota-owned circuit would poach the Japanese GP away from Suzuka.
It is understood that the deal will not be officially announced until Fuji has sorted out other issues relating to the race, including transport and circuit infrastructure like hotels. The date of the event, which has been agreed between Ecclestone and Dr. Saito, will also be announced then.
Despite the Fuji deal, it is understood that Suzuka has not given up hope of continuing to host a Grand Prix and talks are underway to discuss the possibility. Although Fuji will have the Japanese Grand Prix, an alternative title is being considered for Suzuka.
In 1994 and 1995, the Aida circuit hosted the Pacific Grand Prix and this title is one option for Suzuka.[/QUOTE]
| artkevin | 03-20-2006 10:12 AM |
I pray that we don't loose Sazuka. I don't know much about Fuji but I love Sazuka. It doesn't look good though unless one of the German tracks or Itlian tracks goes away. :(
| Harvey_Mushman | 03-20-2006 10:43 AM |
[QUOTE=artkevin] It doesn't look good though unless one of the German tracks or Itlian tracks goes away. :([/QUOTE]
Or the US one...
:(
Or the US one...
:(
| artkevin | 03-20-2006 11:41 AM |
Unh, I forgot about that. Dammit.
| artkevin | 03-20-2006 08:43 PM |
Todt says there are 5 top teams. Good to see my boys at Williams getting a shot out from the little Frenchman
From F1racing.net
Todt sees five top teams
20 March 2006
Ferrari team principal Jean Todt says that he has revised his original position that Renault, Ferrari, McLaren and Honda were the four teams capable of fighting for wins and podiums in 2005 - to include Williams in that number.
"There are four teams which are very strong, even five teams, because Williams has been very strong, was strong in Bahrain and was strong in Malaysia," Todt said. "There was a problem with reliability but otherwise they were very competitive."
"I see five teams who are good competitors at the moment, and some others who may have good potential," he added. "We saw some teams who were not as good as they were in performance at this Grand Prix."
But Renault's winning performance was not a surprise. "There is no major reason why they should not be competitive. They were very good last year, so it's continuity; the same people."
From F1racing.net
Todt sees five top teams
20 March 2006
Ferrari team principal Jean Todt says that he has revised his original position that Renault, Ferrari, McLaren and Honda were the four teams capable of fighting for wins and podiums in 2005 - to include Williams in that number.
"There are four teams which are very strong, even five teams, because Williams has been very strong, was strong in Bahrain and was strong in Malaysia," Todt said. "There was a problem with reliability but otherwise they were very competitive."
"I see five teams who are good competitors at the moment, and some others who may have good potential," he added. "We saw some teams who were not as good as they were in performance at this Grand Prix."
But Renault's winning performance was not a surprise. "There is no major reason why they should not be competitive. They were very good last year, so it's continuity; the same people."
| Ferg | 03-20-2006 09:00 PM |
[QUOTE=TimStevens]
[img]http://www.sniffpetrol.com/latenews0602_01.jpg[/img]
Oh, and in case you don't know who Leo Sayer is:
[img]http://www.comicgenius.com/DiscoFever/disco_profiles/leo_sayer/images/leo1.jpg[/img]
(I didn't)[/QUOTE]
Someone must have heard you talking Tim...
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/image/57536978/original.jpg[/IMG]
:lol:
[img]http://www.sniffpetrol.com/latenews0602_01.jpg[/img]
Oh, and in case you don't know who Leo Sayer is:
[img]http://www.comicgenius.com/DiscoFever/disco_profiles/leo_sayer/images/leo1.jpg[/img]
(I didn't)[/QUOTE]
Someone must have heard you talking Tim...
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/image/57536978/original.jpg[/IMG]
:lol:
| bitterWRX | 03-20-2006 09:04 PM |
Fiji speedway is more about high speeds with their incredibly long straightaway. However Suzuka is more technical and more exciting to watch with its string of esses and the 130R corner. I think that Fiji would be fun and Suzuka would compliment that. But otherwise, I really don't want to see Suzuka leave the F1.
| Ferg | 03-20-2006 09:10 PM |
Fuji...
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/image/57537328/original.jpg[/IMG]
Suzuka...
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/image/56928294/original.jpg[/IMG]
Losing Suzuka, if that's what happens, would be a crime.
Having both would be acceptable.
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/image/57537328/original.jpg[/IMG]
Suzuka...
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/image/56928294/original.jpg[/IMG]
Losing Suzuka, if that's what happens, would be a crime.
Having both would be acceptable.
| Bonzo | 03-20-2006 09:47 PM |
[QUOTE=Ferg]Someone must have heard you talking Tim...
:lol:[/QUOTE]
Someone who? I only see one person in that pic. And she's hoet.
Suzuka is on my top 5 track list in the world. It's the epitome of a drivers track .
Indy road course and Fuji look very similar.
:lol:[/QUOTE]
Someone who? I only see one person in that pic. And she's hoet.
Suzuka is on my top 5 track list in the world. It's the epitome of a drivers track .
Indy road course and Fuji look very similar.
| Fox | 03-20-2006 10:25 PM |
Ferg, judging by your posts, it looks like you have a subscription to Autosport. If that's so, would you please post the Adam Cooper "Wings and a Prayer" story that's on their homepage currently?
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét