| deluxsti | 05-30-2006 04:38 PM |
anyone know how this car is doing?
�
�
anyone know how cobb's SM sti is doing, or if it is even doing at all?
[img]http://www.cobbtuning.com/images/Project_SM_5.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.cobbtuning.com/images/Project_SM_5.jpg[/img]
| WgnWheel | 05-30-2006 11:35 PM |
winning............last race i read about recently, it set fastest time of the day. again. I'll see if i can dig up the article.
| ChrisDP | 05-30-2006 11:45 PM |
at a Subaru Challenge event?
| mofugga | 05-31-2006 03:43 AM |
[QUOTE=ChrisDP]at a Subaru Challenge event?[/QUOTE]
:lol: probably
:lol: probably
| trhoppe | 05-31-2006 08:00 AM |
Or maybe at a local autox? :lol: :lol:
-Tom
-Tom
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 08:02 AM |
Mehhhhh...havn't seen any National/Tour exposure...must be all local stuff......hmmm...wonder if its faster than Stompy or any other WELL Prepped BSP cars..?????? I doubt it......:rolleyes:..Its illegal in SM anyways...since they cut the front bumper beam...should be a FP car...
Bill
Bill
| Corey | 05-31-2006 09:01 AM |
[QUOTE=Scooby South]Its illegal in SM anyways...since they cut the front bumper beam...should be a FP car...
Bill[/QUOTE]
Not that I know anything about the car, but are you sure they cut out more then 1 pound of material from the bumper beam? Speculating that a car is illegal without knowing the facts kinda bugs me... :rolleyes:
Corey #89 STS
Bill[/QUOTE]
Not that I know anything about the car, but are you sure they cut out more then 1 pound of material from the bumper beam? Speculating that a car is illegal without knowing the facts kinda bugs me... :rolleyes:
Corey #89 STS
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 09:28 AM |
[QUOTE=Corey]Not that I know anything about the car, but are you sure they cut out more then 1 pound of material from the bumper beam? Speculating that a car is illegal without knowing the facts kinda bugs me... :rolleyes:
Corey #89 STS[/QUOTE]
ummmmmmm..I would say they cut or replaced the whole beam..."Speculating"...is not the issue......FACT is that for a HUGE front mount to work...they would have to cut AT least 5 or more pounds out of the beam...Basically...when a huge front mount is positioned...it usally uses a new front Beam...TXS, APS, COBB, Insert Big company here....uses a Replacement beam....if it were cut...or they used a replacement beam..is Illegal in SM...period...
Bill
Corey #89 STS[/QUOTE]
ummmmmmm..I would say they cut or replaced the whole beam..."Speculating"...is not the issue......FACT is that for a HUGE front mount to work...they would have to cut AT least 5 or more pounds out of the beam...Basically...when a huge front mount is positioned...it usally uses a new front Beam...TXS, APS, COBB, Insert Big company here....uses a Replacement beam....if it were cut...or they used a replacement beam..is Illegal in SM...period...
Bill
| cooleyjb | 05-31-2006 09:40 AM |
[QUOTE=ChrisDP]at a Subaru Challenge event?[/QUOTE]
sorta.
The Mcree Subaru TExas State Meet.
It was in the drive performance mailing from Subaru that I got a little while ago.
sorta.
The Mcree Subaru TExas State Meet.
It was in the drive performance mailing from Subaru that I got a little while ago.
| Corey | 05-31-2006 10:03 AM |
[QUOTE=Scooby South]ummmmmmm..I would say they cut or replaced the whole beam..."Speculating"...is not the issue......FACT is that for a HUGE front mount to work...they would have to cut AT least 5 or more pounds out of the beam...Basically...when a huge front mount is positioned...it usally uses a new front Beam...TXS, APS, COBB, Insert Big company here....uses a Replacement beam....if it were cut...or they used a replacement beam..is Illegal in SM...period...
Bill[/QUOTE]
Gotcha ;) Thanks for clarifying. Well I guess we'll find out when it hits some National events then. What do I know about FMIC's anyway... I only have a pre-snail car.
Corey #89 STS
Bill[/QUOTE]
Gotcha ;) Thanks for clarifying. Well I guess we'll find out when it hits some National events then. What do I know about FMIC's anyway... I only have a pre-snail car.
Corey #89 STS
| Subaruski | 05-31-2006 10:07 AM |
anyone have any more pics or links to pics of the car?
| FlySpy | 05-31-2006 10:31 AM |
I call B.S. on you Scooby South. Your a moderator! Don't start flapping your gums and stirring up trouble. You are speculating period! Have you seen the front bumper!? NO!! Grow up and Moderate!
ARH
ARH
| Sideshowbob | 05-31-2006 10:39 AM |
[QUOTE=FlySpy]I call B.S. on you Scooby South. Your a moderator! Don't start flapping your gums and stirring up trouble. You are speculating period! Have you seen the front bumper!? NO!! Grow up and Moderate!
ARH[/QUOTE]
wow.
There is no speculation here. You cannot mount any of the big name FMIC's without chopping the front beam.
nuff' said.
ARH[/QUOTE]
wow.
There is no speculation here. You cannot mount any of the big name FMIC's without chopping the front beam.
nuff' said.
| trhoppe | 05-31-2006 10:43 AM |
[QUOTE=FlySpy]I call B.S. on you Scooby South. Your a moderator! Don't start flapping your gums and stirring up trouble. You are speculating period! Have you seen the front bumper!? NO!! Grow up and Moderate!
ARH[/QUOTE]
and you are?
-Tom
ARH[/QUOTE]
and you are?
-Tom
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 10:53 AM |
[QUOTE=FlySpy]I call B.S. on you Scooby South. Your a moderator! Don't start flapping your gums and stirring up trouble. You are speculating period! Have you seen the front bumper!? NO!! Grow up and Moderate!
ARH[/QUOTE]
:lol: :lol: ....no speculation needed.... :lol:
ARH[/QUOTE]
:lol: :lol: ....no speculation needed.... :lol:
| KC | 05-31-2006 10:54 AM |
[QUOTE=FlySpy]I call B.S. on you Scooby South. Your a moderator! Don't start flapping your gums and stirring up trouble. You are speculating period! Have you seen the front bumper!? NO!! Grow up and Moderate!
ARH[/QUOTE]
Umm, he's participating in the discussion, so his moderator hat is off right now. If he does any moderating in this thread, THEN it would be bad karma. However, I doubt that would be forthcoming.
So if you think he's stirring up trouble, you must be in a position to know the particulars of the car in question. Educate us instead of telling people how to behave.
Other than Hoppe, we're all adults here. :lol:
ARH[/QUOTE]
Umm, he's participating in the discussion, so his moderator hat is off right now. If he does any moderating in this thread, THEN it would be bad karma. However, I doubt that would be forthcoming.
So if you think he's stirring up trouble, you must be in a position to know the particulars of the car in question. Educate us instead of telling people how to behave.
Other than Hoppe, we're all adults here. :lol:
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 10:54 AM |
[QUOTE=BeantownWRX]wow.
There is no speculation here. You cannot mount any of the big name FMIC's without chopping the front beam.
nuff' said.[/QUOTE]
agreed ^^^^^
There is no speculation here. You cannot mount any of the big name FMIC's without chopping the front beam.
nuff' said.[/QUOTE]
agreed ^^^^^
| trhoppe | 05-31-2006 10:56 AM |
[QUOTE=KC]
Other than Hoppe, we're all adults here. :lol:[/QUOTE] :furious: I'm legally an adult damnit :furious:
-Tom
Other than Hoppe, we're all adults here. :lol:[/QUOTE] :furious: I'm legally an adult damnit :furious:
-Tom
| KC | 05-31-2006 11:00 AM |
Oh... what Front Mount is it? Cobb doesn't list one on their site.
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 11:04 AM |
Well lets see....SOD/APS/COBB
APS Definely uses a Replacement beam.....
If I were in SM ....at a national event..I would WITHOUT a Doubt...PROTEST that car...Period...obviously your a FanBOi....:lol:...
APS Definely uses a Replacement beam.....
If I were in SM ....at a national event..I would WITHOUT a Doubt...PROTEST that car...Period...obviously your a FanBOi....:lol:...
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 11:20 AM |
[URL=http://scca.org/Event/Result.asp?Ref2=266]Houston Tour.....4th in class...mehhh[/URL]
| CamaroFS34 | 05-31-2006 11:29 AM |
[QUOTE=trhoppe]and you are?[/QUOTE]
Judging from his initials, I'd have to guess Andrew Hahn?
Karen
Judging from his initials, I'd have to guess Andrew Hahn?
Karen
| Sparks | 05-31-2006 11:34 AM |
read the rules
�
�
[QUOTE=FlySpy]I call B.S. on you Scooby South. Your a moderator! Don't start flapping your gums and stirring up trouble. You are speculating period! Have you seen the front bumper!? NO!! Grow up and Moderate!
ARH[/QUOTE]
You should read the rules very carefully before you open your mouth.
A little bit of knowledge can be dangerous in the wrong hands.
ARH[/QUOTE]
You should read the rules very carefully before you open your mouth.
A little bit of knowledge can be dangerous in the wrong hands.
| cooleyjb | 05-31-2006 11:37 AM |
[QUOTE=CamaroFS34]Judging from his initials, I'd have to guess Andrew Hahn?
Karen[/QUOTE]
looking at signatures on old posts it is.
Karen[/QUOTE]
looking at signatures on old posts it is.
| Subaruski | 05-31-2006 12:22 PM |
So everyone is upset because they hacked the bumper beam to fit in the front mount? Wow....autoX is strict.
| trhoppe | 05-31-2006 12:24 PM |
No, everyone is not "upset".
He just broke the rules for the class that he is running. EVERY SPORT ON THE PLANET HAS RULES. If you break the PARTICULAR RULES FOR THAT SPORT, it would be the same thing as this. It just happens that the RULE IN HIS CLASS prohibits from hacking bumper beams.
Why is this stuff so hard to understand? Does rally not have rules? Does drag racing not have rules? I *know* road racing has rules. I guess street racing doesn't.
-Tom
He just broke the rules for the class that he is running. EVERY SPORT ON THE PLANET HAS RULES. If you break the PARTICULAR RULES FOR THAT SPORT, it would be the same thing as this. It just happens that the RULE IN HIS CLASS prohibits from hacking bumper beams.
Why is this stuff so hard to understand? Does rally not have rules? Does drag racing not have rules? I *know* road racing has rules. I guess street racing doesn't.
-Tom
| FlySpy | 05-31-2006 12:26 PM |
First, My name is Andrew thats no secret.....Does it matter who I am to leave a post here. I just think that everyone is so quick to judge people including myself. I dont even know Scooby South and I apoligize for snapping. Just dont speculate. If you were charged with cheating would'nt you be concerned?
Andrew
Andrew
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 12:29 PM |
[QUOTE=Subaruski420]So everyone is upset because they hacked the bumper beam to fit in the front mount? Wow....autoX is strict.[/QUOTE]
Its not that we are upset....but rules are rules...ESPECIALLY on a NATIONAL level/known car...it seems it would be under scutany at that level...Local stuff..no one cares.......
Ask Vic Sias if its legal...
[QUOTE]Competitors may pick and choose between all Stock, Street
Touring, Street Prepared, and Street Modified allowances when
preparing an SM car. Apparent conflicts between inherited rule
sets from 16.1.A shall not prohibit any specific inherited allowance.
Allowances inherited from 16.1.A may not incorporate SMspecific
allowances. Foreign spec parts may not be used to
substitute for parts which are required to remain stock.*�[/QUOTE]�
Would you want to run against a car knowing it will beat you and is illegal for the class????
Bill
Its not that we are upset....but rules are rules...ESPECIALLY on a NATIONAL level/known car...it seems it would be under scutany at that level...Local stuff..no one cares.......
Ask Vic Sias if its legal...
[QUOTE]Competitors may pick and choose between all Stock, Street
Touring, Street Prepared, and Street Modified allowances when
preparing an SM car. Apparent conflicts between inherited rule
sets from 16.1.A shall not prohibit any specific inherited allowance.
Allowances inherited from 16.1.A may not incorporate SMspecific
allowances. Foreign spec parts may not be used to
substitute for parts which are required to remain stock.*�[/QUOTE]�
Would you want to run against a car knowing it will beat you and is illegal for the class????
Bill
| FlySpy | 05-31-2006 12:33 PM |
I run against cars all of the time that illegal in their class for some reason or the other. We all have and I guess it really only matters if they are faster than we are. I dont post alot on the forums because I usually get in a fight of some sort. all I'm saying is that we are speculating on the bumper, it makes sense that it is cut, but I don't know for sure, so I will not say anyhting. That's why we protest......maybe someone should warn the owner that this may be a problem. Thanks for your understanding Bill!
Andrew
Andrew
| trhoppe | 05-31-2006 12:34 PM |
I've been charged with cheating plenty of times. I've never once been worried about it as I had a legal car. (well, rulebook legal ;) )
-Tom
-Tom
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 12:45 PM |
[QUOTE=FlySpy].....Does it matter who I am to leave a post here. If you were charged with cheating would'nt you be concerned?
Andrew[/QUOTE]
Actually yes it does....and yes I would be concerned...
Everybody knows that when you put a BIG Frontmount on...you will HAVE to do something with the beam......
first off...the Beam Part# 57711FE071 is a Double Beam...and right below the top part of a stock Bumper...is a black strip in the middle...behind that is the Absorber..Part # 57705FE040...The absorber is mated to the beam...which is behind Said Black Strip...the absorber is Obviously Gone...along with the bottem Beam on the Stock Bumper beam...which is a helluva lot more weight than 1lb....more like 20lbs....
The other "indicator" is that the intercooler piping has to to be Routed behind the foglight covers...which you will have to cut the end parts of the beam to get the piping to fit...
anyother Questions....I can provide you a detailed list if you want...and frankly..I am surprised noone protested the car before I said anything...
Bill
#16 BSP ( Who found out his wing was illegal..just last week)...
Andrew[/QUOTE]
Actually yes it does....and yes I would be concerned...
Everybody knows that when you put a BIG Frontmount on...you will HAVE to do something with the beam......
first off...the Beam Part# 57711FE071 is a Double Beam...and right below the top part of a stock Bumper...is a black strip in the middle...behind that is the Absorber..Part # 57705FE040...The absorber is mated to the beam...which is behind Said Black Strip...the absorber is Obviously Gone...along with the bottem Beam on the Stock Bumper beam...which is a helluva lot more weight than 1lb....more like 20lbs....
The other "indicator" is that the intercooler piping has to to be Routed behind the foglight covers...which you will have to cut the end parts of the beam to get the piping to fit...
anyother Questions....I can provide you a detailed list if you want...and frankly..I am surprised noone protested the car before I said anything...
Bill
#16 BSP ( Who found out his wing was illegal..just last week)...
| deluxsti | 05-31-2006 12:48 PM |
your wing is aftermarket then right?
| Virrdog | 05-31-2006 12:50 PM |
Nope, has a little plastic strip on it. Mad 25 mph aerodynamic advantage in a parking lot. :)
| cooleyjb | 05-31-2006 01:06 PM |
[QUOTE=FlySpy]. If you were charged with cheating would'nt you be concerned?
Andrew[/QUOTE]
I'd rather find out now than at Nationals after day one is completed and I have no chance to go back in time to fix it.
It could be that he interpreted the rules differently when the car was built. This could be an honest mistake.
Just becuase you are in a region where there are a number of illegal cars doens't mean that it is okay everywhere.
Andrew[/QUOTE]
I'd rather find out now than at Nationals after day one is completed and I have no chance to go back in time to fix it.
It could be that he interpreted the rules differently when the car was built. This could be an honest mistake.
Just becuase you are in a region where there are a number of illegal cars doens't mean that it is okay everywhere.
| DrBiggly | 05-31-2006 01:14 PM |
I wonder if this one is called Conehumper v2.0 or did they adopt a new name over the yellow one? :)
-Biggly
-Biggly
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 01:18 PM |
[QUOTE=Virrdog]Nope, has a little plastic strip on it. Mad 25 mph aerodynamic advantage in a parking lot. :)[/QUOTE]
Exactly...^^^^still :mad: over that one...
Look I didnt' mean to create a ruckus.....honest..I think its great that Cobb and SOD have a reputation...there are quite a few threads over a FM in SM ....if it retained the stock Bumper beam...and/or didn't remove any material to make it fit....the carry on...But most of us know here that it has.....
not a big deal...if Chris wants to continue to drive it...who am I to say he can't...
Bill
Exactly...^^^^still :mad: over that one...
Look I didnt' mean to create a ruckus.....honest..I think its great that Cobb and SOD have a reputation...there are quite a few threads over a FM in SM ....if it retained the stock Bumper beam...and/or didn't remove any material to make it fit....the carry on...But most of us know here that it has.....
not a big deal...if Chris wants to continue to drive it...who am I to say he can't...
Bill
| Scooby South | 05-31-2006 01:37 PM |
[QUOTE=cooleyjb]I'd rather find out now than at Nationals after day one is completed and I have no chance to go back in time to fix it.
It could be that he interpreted the rules differently when the car was built. This could be an honest mistake.
Just becuase you are in a region where there are a number of illegal cars doens't mean that it is okay everywhere.[/QUOTE]
And I DEFINATELY agree here...:D
It could be that he interpreted the rules differently when the car was built. This could be an honest mistake.
Just becuase you are in a region where there are a number of illegal cars doens't mean that it is okay everywhere.[/QUOTE]
And I DEFINATELY agree here...:D
| boost_is_best | 05-31-2006 10:18 PM |
damn that thing is clean
| KC | 06-01-2006 07:42 AM |
[QUOTE=boost_is_best]damn that thing is clean[/QUOTE]
Wow.. new member banned. :lol:
Oh, and Chris is a pu**y after moving away from the snow of the North East to Tx. And what's with the grid system anyway?
--kC
(He grew up about 10 min from me.... 1st nationals in Topeka we went to we were talking and the convo somehow got around to having fun in the snow with cars. Evidently, we both used to go tooling down the same back roads when I found out he used to live here... :lol: Trying to explain it to Trey was priceless... I think it was Trey anyways)
Wow.. new member banned. :lol:
Oh, and Chris is a pu**y after moving away from the snow of the North East to Tx. And what's with the grid system anyway?
--kC
(He grew up about 10 min from me.... 1st nationals in Topeka we went to we were talking and the convo somehow got around to having fun in the snow with cars. Evidently, we both used to go tooling down the same back roads when I found out he used to live here... :lol: Trying to explain it to Trey was priceless... I think it was Trey anyways)
| culturedetox | 06-01-2006 11:14 AM |
[url]http://autocross.com/tr/tr306.shtml[/url]
he was at the last local scca autocross here in dallas. dont know if he is looking to go back to nationals or not.
he was at the last local scca autocross here in dallas. dont know if he is looking to go back to nationals or not.
| DrBiggly | 06-01-2006 11:44 AM |
[QUOTE=culturedetox][url]http://autocross.com/tr/tr306.shtml[/url]
he was at the last local scca autocross here in dallas. dont know if he is looking to go back to nationals or not.[/QUOTE]
According to those results, the Cobb car was over a second slower than the two BSP EVOs. (Nearly 1.5 seconds for the faster of the two EVOs.) Sounds like some seriously fast EVOs! :eek:
-Biggly
he was at the last local scca autocross here in dallas. dont know if he is looking to go back to nationals or not.[/QUOTE]
According to those results, the Cobb car was over a second slower than the two BSP EVOs. (Nearly 1.5 seconds for the faster of the two EVOs.) Sounds like some seriously fast EVOs! :eek:
-Biggly
| rt4me | 06-01-2006 12:49 PM |
Seriously good drivers too.
| trhoppe | 06-01-2006 01:12 PM |
Well, it was also only 0.7 ahead of STU ;) I would hope those 315 R comps and the super power its making would be worth more then 0.7.
-Tom
-Tom
| AtomicRacer | 06-01-2006 02:03 PM |
[QUOTE=trhoppe]Well, it was also only 0.7 ahead of STU ;) I would hope those 315 R comps and the super power its making would be worth more then 0.7.
-Tom[/QUOTE]
That event was at the TMS bus lot, a very low grip sealed asphalt surface. The spread there between the ST* cars and "R" compound cars tends to be much smaller. Also that particular course was very transition heavy and no power spots. Not justifying anything, just adding comment.
-Paul
ps: Dead Neova's suck very bad there too. =/
-Tom[/QUOTE]
That event was at the TMS bus lot, a very low grip sealed asphalt surface. The spread there between the ST* cars and "R" compound cars tends to be much smaller. Also that particular course was very transition heavy and no power spots. Not justifying anything, just adding comment.
-Paul
ps: Dead Neova's suck very bad there too. =/
| KC | 06-01-2006 02:32 PM |
Paul,
Tom was being sarcastic... an SM car shouldn't be losing to BSP by a second... the SM carshould be faster. If anything, all things being equal, Chris needed a 51.522 to beat SM in PAX.
Here are the Pax results: [url]http://autocross.com/tr/tr306pax.shtml[/url]
Nothing looks out of whack there in those results. Good mix up front. If it really was too slipepry a surface and a course that favored transitional cars (speed maintenance), you'd see more street tired cars in the top 20. I only see 3.
-kC
Tom was being sarcastic... an SM car shouldn't be losing to BSP by a second... the SM carshould be faster. If anything, all things being equal, Chris needed a 51.522 to beat SM in PAX.
Here are the Pax results: [url]http://autocross.com/tr/tr306pax.shtml[/url]
Nothing looks out of whack there in those results. Good mix up front. If it really was too slipepry a surface and a course that favored transitional cars (speed maintenance), you'd see more street tired cars in the top 20. I only see 3.
-kC
| Draken | 06-01-2006 02:43 PM |
Hoppe is a *****.
Glad I could contribute.
Chris H.
Glad I could contribute.
Chris H.
| crystalhelix | 06-01-2006 02:48 PM |
[QUOTE=Subaruski420]So everyone is upset because they hacked the bumper beam to fit in the front mount? Wow....autoX is strict.[/QUOTE]
Actually for the most parts, rules have to make sense. And if it wasn't strict there would be a lot of things done with good intentions that don't meet the rules
I'd have to agree with all above, that FMIC looks huge and heads north into the bumper and that's beam territory.
J
Actually for the most parts, rules have to make sense. And if it wasn't strict there would be a lot of things done with good intentions that don't meet the rules
I'd have to agree with all above, that FMIC looks huge and heads north into the bumper and that's beam territory.
J
| vanskater | 06-01-2006 03:30 PM |
[QUOTE=DrBiggly]I wonder if this one is called Conehumper v2.0 or did they adopt a new name over the yellow one? :)
-Biggly[/QUOTE]
from what i heard that is the yellow one.
i heard the yellow one got wrecked, and they just rebuilt it and redid the front end.
this was heard from a unrealiable soruce so dont quote me on it.
-Biggly[/QUOTE]
from what i heard that is the yellow one.
i heard the yellow one got wrecked, and they just rebuilt it and redid the front end.
this was heard from a unrealiable soruce so dont quote me on it.
| KC | 06-01-2006 03:42 PM |
[QUOTE=vanskater]from what i heard that is the yellow one.
i heard the yellow one got wrecked, and they just rebuilt it and redid the front end.
this was heard from a unrealiable soruce so dont quote me on it.[/QUOTE]
The 1st car that was wrecked was a WRX. SCC drove it into the back of a water tank in or around 2003-2004 for a magazine test.
You mean to tell me that they bought an STi... and that was already wrecked/rebuilt too?
--kC
i heard the yellow one got wrecked, and they just rebuilt it and redid the front end.
this was heard from a unrealiable soruce so dont quote me on it.[/QUOTE]
The 1st car that was wrecked was a WRX. SCC drove it into the back of a water tank in or around 2003-2004 for a magazine test.
You mean to tell me that they bought an STi... and that was already wrecked/rebuilt too?
--kC
| culturedetox | 06-01-2006 03:52 PM |
the fastest evo is a daily driver too. I talked to the driver the other day when I saw him on the road about a week after the auto X. he does a 60 mile daily commute in that car :eek:
| AUTOwrXER | 06-01-2006 03:57 PM |
I don't need to know anything about the bumper to tell you that this car is not compliant. The fender flares for the rear tires are not legal by SP allowances, and there is nothing additional in SM that would justify it. 15.2.A gives an allowance for fenders, and the portion of the bumper and the hood which constitute the fender. There is no allowance to modify the door. It screws 4 door guys who want the "widebody" look, but that's the rule. The car is not compliant any way you look at it.
| AUTOwrXER | 06-01-2006 03:58 PM |
[QUOTE=Scooby South][URL=http://scca.org/Event/Result.asp?Ref2=266]Houston Tour.....4th in class...mehhh[/URL][/QUOTE]
He was about 5 seconds off the pace there looking at SS times. SM was won by an ESP car.
He was about 5 seconds off the pace there looking at SS times. SM was won by an ESP car.
| AUTOwrXER | 06-01-2006 04:01 PM |
[QUOTE=DrBiggly]Sounds like some seriously fast EVOs! :eek:
-Biggly[/QUOTE]
Ah, yeah. Those are some impressive times. Looks like there will be even more good competition in Topeka than expected. As if Tunnell, Tak, Lieber, Olsen, Mitchell, Saini, Uyeda, JG-W, Team Shimmy Sideways, and my co-driver weren't enough :lol:
-Biggly[/QUOTE]
Ah, yeah. Those are some impressive times. Looks like there will be even more good competition in Topeka than expected. As if Tunnell, Tak, Lieber, Olsen, Mitchell, Saini, Uyeda, JG-W, Team Shimmy Sideways, and my co-driver weren't enough :lol:
| DrBiggly | 06-01-2006 05:10 PM |
[QUOTE=AUTOwrXER]Ah, yeah. Those are some impressive times. Looks like there will be even more good competition in Topeka than expected. As if Tunnell, Tak, Lieber, Olsen, Mitchell, Saini, Uyeda, JG-W, Team Shimmy Sideways, and my co-driver weren't enough :lol:[/QUOTE]
Is Tunnell running BSP or STU? I thought he ran a Tour/Pro or something like that out in CA in STU? :confused: :)
-Biggly
Is Tunnell running BSP or STU? I thought he ran a Tour/Pro or something like that out in CA in STU? :confused: :)
-Biggly
| vanskater | 06-01-2006 05:26 PM |
[QUOTE=KC]The 1st car that was wrecked was a WRX. SCC drove it into the back of a water tank in or around 2003-2004 for a magazine test.
You mean to tell me that they bought an STi... and that was already wrecked/rebuilt too?
--kC[/QUOTE]
no.
they rebuilt the yellow one into this one with the front end conversion so iv heard
You mean to tell me that they bought an STi... and that was already wrecked/rebuilt too?
--kC[/QUOTE]
no.
they rebuilt the yellow one into this one with the front end conversion so iv heard
| BlkWRXWag | 06-01-2006 05:38 PM |
[QUOTE=DrBiggly]Is Tunnell running BSP or STU? I thought he ran a Tour/Pro or something like that out in CA in STU? :confused: :)
-Biggly[/QUOTE]
Tunnell ran the Atwater Pro in STU. I believe that was just for fun though and I'm not sure he enjoyed street tires too much!
-Biggly[/QUOTE]
Tunnell ran the Atwater Pro in STU. I believe that was just for fun though and I'm not sure he enjoyed street tires too much!
| KC | 06-01-2006 06:19 PM |
[QUOTE=vanskater]no.
they rebuilt the yellow one into this one with the front end conversion so iv heard[/QUOTE]
So it's a WRX to an STi conversion?
they rebuilt the yellow one into this one with the front end conversion so iv heard[/QUOTE]
So it's a WRX to an STi conversion?
| Homemade WRX | 06-01-2006 07:18 PM |
[QUOTE=trhoppe]I've been charged with cheating plenty of times. I've never once been worried about it as I had a legal car. (well, rulebook legal ;) )
-Tom[/QUOTE]
and loop-holes are great!! :banana:
-Tom[/QUOTE]
and loop-holes are great!! :banana:
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét