| extraducksauce | 11-27-2004 12:23 AM |
Which one do you want to have in your driveway?
�
�
Which one is your dream WRC car?
[img]http://swrt.com/cpimages/360590.jpg[/img]
versus
[img]http://swrt.com/cpimages/96972.jpg[/img]
versus
[img]http://swrt.com/cpimages/648808.jpg[/img]
versus
[img]http://www.fast-autos.net/features/04naias/srt4.jpg[/img]
[img]http://swrt.com/cpimages/360590.jpg[/img]
versus
[img]http://swrt.com/cpimages/96972.jpg[/img]
versus
[img]http://swrt.com/cpimages/648808.jpg[/img]
versus
[img]http://www.fast-autos.net/features/04naias/srt4.jpg[/img]
| joe r | 11-27-2004 12:55 AM |
I would have to say the 2002 sence I just sold my SRT-4 for the 2002 wrx wagon,I love the bug eye look.
joe r
joe r
| SolbergWRCfan | 11-27-2004 12:59 AM |
2004, it is the fastest.
Jon
Jon
| Imprezivblue | 11-27-2004 01:50 AM |
2000 ;)
| codemunky | 11-27-2004 01:51 AM |
2000 hands down. c'mon... looks, lightness...it's one of the reasons subaru dominated repeatedly.
| extraducksauce | 11-27-2004 03:10 AM |
yeah, i partial to the 22b. drop dead gorgeous. no contest for me.
| speedyHAM | 11-27-2004 07:26 AM |
2004 all the way. Heavier- yes, bigger- yes, faster in all conditions- YES.
I like the look of the 2000 much better, but I have to go with faster always.
I like the look of the 2000 much better, but I have to go with faster always.
| AndyRoo | 11-27-2004 12:03 PM |
[QUOTE=speedyHAM]2004 all the way. Heavier- yes, bigger- yes, faster in all conditions- YES.
I like the look of the 2000 much better, but I have to go with faster always.[/QUOTE]
well they're probably the same weight. they're limited to 1230 kgs. I don't know which weighs less after the ballast is taken out (or if they even have ballast) but i would expect the 2004 to be lighter cause it's probably used a little more advanced materials and cause of 4 extra years of devolopement.
I picked 2000 cause it looks cooler, thats all :)
I like the look of the 2000 much better, but I have to go with faster always.[/QUOTE]
well they're probably the same weight. they're limited to 1230 kgs. I don't know which weighs less after the ballast is taken out (or if they even have ballast) but i would expect the 2004 to be lighter cause it's probably used a little more advanced materials and cause of 4 extra years of devolopement.
I picked 2000 cause it looks cooler, thats all :)
| ibsmd425 | 11-27-2004 12:22 PM |
2000, i like the heritage.
SEAN
SEAN
| Ryan24 | 11-27-2004 02:10 PM |
2000
| joe z | 11-27-2004 03:20 PM |
2000
| Predwolf | 11-27-2004 04:48 PM |
2000.
Looks mean enough to eat you alive.
I love the 04' though :).
Looks mean enough to eat you alive.
I love the 04' though :).
| Apex Rex | 11-27-2004 05:58 PM |
2004 :)
| skusaskusaskusa | 11-27-2004 09:37 PM |
[FONT=Fixedsys][SIZE=7][COLOR=PaleGreen]SRT-4 BITCH[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
:disco: :banana: :disco: :banana: :disco: :banana: :disco: :banana: :disco:
:disco: :banana: :disco: :banana: :disco: :banana: :disco: :banana: :disco:
| finnRex | 11-27-2004 11:46 PM |
2000
Mika
Mika
| enewtabie | 11-27-2004 11:54 PM |
02 yeah
| RoundtheBend | 11-28-2004 12:26 AM |
2000
| MNbiker | 11-28-2004 12:52 AM |
'04
but I'm a geek, so all the gee-whiz technology in the car won me over. :p
but I'm a geek, so all the gee-whiz technology in the car won me over. :p
| Slack | 11-28-2004 09:28 AM |
2000. :D
Mick
Mick
| blksubie | 11-28-2004 10:36 AM |
none of the above I have 05 STI
| mykrrrr | 11-28-2004 10:58 AM |
I love the heritage of the '00 but I'll take the '04. :D
I've already got my "classic" Impreza wagon sitting outside. :p
I'll just race some chode for his SRT-4 pink slip w/the '04. "kid...it's only an '04 w/a body kit...hehehe" :devil:
-mykr.
I've already got my "classic" Impreza wagon sitting outside. :p
I'll just race some chode for his SRT-4 pink slip w/the '04. "kid...it's only an '04 w/a body kit...hehehe" :devil:
-mykr.
| spongejosh | 11-28-2004 11:07 AM |
i love my bugeyes, but i would kill for the oldschool. 2000 all the way.
| Subystud | 11-28-2004 11:09 AM |
02, b/c fog covers on 2000 are gh3y.
| Rallycarperson | 11-28-2004 12:43 PM |
I went with 02. :confused:
Always liked bugeyes...
-Mark
MAPmotors.com
Always liked bugeyes...
-Mark
MAPmotors.com
| Butt Dyno | 11-28-2004 08:01 PM |
[QUOTE=codemunky]2000 hands down. c'mon... looks, lightness...it's one of the reasons subaru dominated repeatedly.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=speedyHAM]2004 all the way. Heavier- yes, bigger- yes, faster in all conditions- YES.
I like the look of the 2000 much better, but I have to go with faster always.[/QUOTE]
Minimum weights, people.. anyhoo, I am partial to the buggity eyes...
john
[QUOTE=speedyHAM]2004 all the way. Heavier- yes, bigger- yes, faster in all conditions- YES.
I like the look of the 2000 much better, but I have to go with faster always.[/QUOTE]
Minimum weights, people.. anyhoo, I am partial to the buggity eyes...
john
| kgb | 11-28-2004 09:28 PM |
04 over 00 seeing that they are both minimum weight.
| dwx | 11-28-2004 11:00 PM |
2004. Faster. Meaner looking than the 2000.
| ratt_finkel | 11-29-2004 03:27 PM |
2000, in a heart beat.
| MattJP | 11-30-2004 12:18 PM |
2000, of course. I still love my 2000 RS!!
Matt -
Matt -
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét